On 19.5.2016 13:03, Fraser Tweedale wrote:
On Thu, May 19, 2016 at 09:52:08AM +0200, Jan Cholasta wrote:
On 19.5.2016 01:31, Fraser Tweedale wrote:
On Wed, May 18, 2016 at 03:17:37PM +0200, Jan Cholasta wrote:
Hi,
On 18.5.2016 08:09, Fraser Tweedale wrote:
Rebased version of 0057 attached,
On Thu, May 19, 2016 at 09:52:08AM +0200, Jan Cholasta wrote:
> On 19.5.2016 01:31, Fraser Tweedale wrote:
> > On Wed, May 18, 2016 at 03:17:37PM +0200, Jan Cholasta wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > On 18.5.2016 08:09, Fraser Tweedale wrote:
> > > > Rebased version of 0057 attached, along with new
On 19.5.2016 01:31, Fraser Tweedale wrote:
On Wed, May 18, 2016 at 03:17:37PM +0200, Jan Cholasta wrote:
Hi,
On 18.5.2016 08:09, Fraser Tweedale wrote:
Rebased version of 0057 attached, along with new patch 0058 that
detects when the Dogtag version of caIPAserviceCert has been
erroneously
On Wed, May 18, 2016 at 03:17:37PM +0200, Jan Cholasta wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 18.5.2016 08:09, Fraser Tweedale wrote:
> > Rebased version of 0057 attached, along with new patch 0058 that
> > detects when the Dogtag version of caIPAserviceCert has been
> > erroneously imported and repairs the
Hi,
On 18.5.2016 08:09, Fraser Tweedale wrote:
Rebased version of 0057 attached, along with new patch 0058 that
detects when the Dogtag version of caIPAserviceCert has been
erroneously imported and repairs the profile.
How to reproduce the issue? So far I had no luck with
Rebased version of 0057 attached, along with new patch 0058 that
detects when the Dogtag version of caIPAserviceCert has been
erroneously imported and repairs the profile.
Thanks,
Fraser
From 9994a98a0cd3bcf6b4af72708c7ac1cfdfdd5440 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Fraser Tweedale
