On 07/01/2016 11:31 AM, David Kupka wrote:
On 01/07/16 11:22, thierry bordaz wrote:
On 07/01/2016 10:46 AM, David Kupka wrote:
Hello Thierry!
Thanks for looking into it. I will try to answer your questions and
comments inline.
On 01/07/16 10:26, thierry bordaz wrote:
Hi David,
The
On 01/07/16 11:22, thierry bordaz wrote:
On 07/01/2016 10:46 AM, David Kupka wrote:
Hello Thierry!
Thanks for looking into it. I will try to answer your questions and
comments inline.
On 01/07/16 10:26, thierry bordaz wrote:
Hi David,
The patch looks good but being not familiar with that
On 07/01/2016 10:46 AM, David Kupka wrote:
> Hello Thierry!
>
> Thanks for looking into it. I will try to answer your questions and
> comments inline.
>
> On 01/07/16 10:26, thierry bordaz wrote:
>> Hi David,
>>
>> The patch looks good but being not familiar with that code, my comments
>> may be
On 07/01/2016 10:46 AM, David Kupka wrote:
Hello Thierry!
Thanks for looking into it. I will try to answer your questions and
comments inline.
On 01/07/16 10:26, thierry bordaz wrote:
Hi David,
The patch looks good but being not familiar with that code, my comments
may be absolutely
Hello Thierry!
Thanks for looking into it. I will try to answer your questions and
comments inline.
On 01/07/16 10:26, thierry bordaz wrote:
Hi David,
The patch looks good but being not familiar with that code, my comments
may be absolutely wrong
In ipadb_get_pwd_expiration, if it is not
Hi David,
I did a functional review, and everything works well, so functional-ACK.
But I did not do the code review.
On 07/01/2016 10:26 AM, thierry bordaz wrote:
Hi David,
The patch looks good but being not familiar with that code, my
comments may be absolutely wrong
In
Hi David,
The patch looks good but being not familiar with that code, my comments
may be absolutely wrong
In ipadb_get_pwd_expiration, if it is not 'self' we set '*export=mod_time'.
If for some reason 'mod_time==0', it has now a specific meaning 'not
expiring' . Does it match the comment '*
On 30/06/16 21:34, David Kupka wrote:
On 04/05/16 17:22, Pavel Vomacka wrote:
On 05/04/2016 04:36 PM, Simo Sorce wrote:
On Wed, 2016-05-04 at 15:39 +0200, Martin Kosek wrote:
On 05/02/2016 02:28 PM, David Kupka wrote:
https://fedorahosted.org/freeipa/ticket/2795
That patch looks
On 04/05/16 17:22, Pavel Vomacka wrote:
On 05/04/2016 04:36 PM, Simo Sorce wrote:
On Wed, 2016-05-04 at 15:39 +0200, Martin Kosek wrote:
On 05/02/2016 02:28 PM, David Kupka wrote:
https://fedorahosted.org/freeipa/ticket/2795
That patch looks suspiciously short given the struggles I saw in
On 05/04/2016 04:36 PM, Simo Sorce wrote:
On Wed, 2016-05-04 at 15:39 +0200, Martin Kosek wrote:
On 05/02/2016 02:28 PM, David Kupka wrote:
https://fedorahosted.org/freeipa/ticket/2795
That patch looks suspiciously short given the struggles I saw in
On Wed, 2016-05-04 at 15:39 +0200, Martin Kosek wrote:
> On 05/02/2016 02:28 PM, David Kupka wrote:
> > https://fedorahosted.org/freeipa/ticket/2795
>
> That patch looks suspiciously short given the struggles I saw in
> http://www.redhat.com/archives/freeipa-devel/2015-June/msg00198.html
> :-)
>
On 05/02/2016 02:28 PM, David Kupka wrote:
> https://fedorahosted.org/freeipa/ticket/2795
That patch looks suspiciously short given the struggles I saw in
http://www.redhat.com/archives/freeipa-devel/2015-June/msg00198.html
:-)
Instead of setting to IPAPWD_END_OF_TIME, should we instead avoid
12 matches
Mail list logo
