On 06.05.2016 14:45, Martin Basti wrote:
On 04.05.2016 14:30, Gabe Alford wrote:
On Wed, May 4, 2016 at 1:35 AM, Patrice Duc-Jacquet
wrote:
Hi everyone
this is a second update that take into account review feedback.
In case the proposal fix is K what
Patrice,
Can you please send rebased version of this patch?
Thanks,
Gabe
On Fri, May 6, 2016 at 6:45 AM, Martin Basti wrote:
>
>
> On 04.05.2016 14:30, Gabe Alford wrote:
>
> On Wed, May 4, 2016 at 1:35 AM, Patrice Duc-Jacquet <
> patdu...@gmail.com>
On 04.05.2016 14:30, Gabe Alford wrote:
On Wed, May 4, 2016 at 1:35 AM, Patrice Duc-Jacquet
> wrote:
Hi everyone
this is a second update that take into account review feedback.
In case the proposal fix is K what are the next step
On Wed, May 4, 2016 at 1:35 AM, Patrice Duc-Jacquet
wrote:
> Hi everyone
>
> this is a second update that take into account review feedback.
>
> In case the proposal fix is K what are the next step to commit this
> change. I'm not sure to really understand the process. Thanks
Hi everyone
this is a second update that take into account review feedback.
In case the proposal fix is K what are the next step to commit this
change. I'm not sure to really understand the process. Thanks and regards
Pat
>From 0a2b0da4a1f2c517fae392ae3314796c0ebeee9a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00