Jan Cholasta wrote:
On 5.4.2012 20:55, Rob Crittenden wrote:
Jan Cholasta wrote:
On 5.4.2012 17:04, Rob Crittenden wrote:
When constructing netgroup triples with hostcat or usercat set to
all we
weren't setting the user/host part of the triple correctly. The first
entry would have '' as the
On 5.4.2012 20:55, Rob Crittenden wrote:
Jan Cholasta wrote:
On 5.4.2012 17:04, Rob Crittenden wrote:
When constructing netgroup triples with hostcat or usercat set to all we
weren't setting the user/host part of the triple correctly. The first
entry would have '' as the host/user value as
When constructing netgroup triples with hostcat or usercat set to all we
weren't setting the user/host part of the triple correctly. The first
entry would have '' as the host/user value as appropriate but all
subsequent entries would have -. They should all be empty.
This patch uses a new
On 5.4.2012 17:04, Rob Crittenden wrote:
When constructing netgroup triples with hostcat or usercat set to all we
weren't setting the user/host part of the triple correctly. The first
entry would have '' as the host/user value as appropriate but all
subsequent entries would have -. They should
Jan Cholasta wrote:
On 5.4.2012 17:04, Rob Crittenden wrote:
When constructing netgroup triples with hostcat or usercat set to all we
weren't setting the user/host part of the triple correctly. The first
entry would have '' as the host/user value as appropriate but all
subsequent entries would
