On 09.12.2015 11:14, Oleg Fayans wrote:
Hi Martin
On 12/09/2015 10:30 AM, Martin Basti wrote:
On 08.12.2015 23:48, Oleg Fayans wrote:
Substituted a hardcoded suffix name with a constant DOMAIN_SUFFIX_NAME
On 12/08/2015 02:33 PM, Oleg Fayans wrote:
Hi all,
The patches are rebased
On 08.12.2015 23:48, Oleg Fayans wrote:
Substituted a hardcoded suffix name with a constant DOMAIN_SUFFIX_NAME
On 12/08/2015 02:33 PM, Oleg Fayans wrote:
Hi all,
The patches are rebased against the current master.
On 12/02/2015 05:10 PM, Martin Basti wrote:
On 02.12.2015 16:18, Oleg
Hi Martin
On 12/09/2015 10:30 AM, Martin Basti wrote:
>
>
> On 08.12.2015 23:48, Oleg Fayans wrote:
>> Substituted a hardcoded suffix name with a constant DOMAIN_SUFFIX_NAME
>>
>> On 12/08/2015 02:33 PM, Oleg Fayans wrote:
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>>
>>> The patches are rebased against the current
Hi all,
The patches are rebased against the current master.
On 12/02/2015 05:10 PM, Martin Basti wrote:
>
>
> On 02.12.2015 16:18, Oleg Fayans wrote:
>> Hi Martin,
>>
>> On 12/01/2015 04:08 PM, Martin Basti wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> On 27.11.2015 16:26, Oleg Fayans wrote:
And patch N 16 passes
Substituted a hardcoded suffix name with a constant DOMAIN_SUFFIX_NAME
On 12/08/2015 02:33 PM, Oleg Fayans wrote:
> Hi all,
>
>
> The patches are rebased against the current master.
>
> On 12/02/2015 05:10 PM, Martin Basti wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 02.12.2015 16:18, Oleg Fayans wrote:
>>> Hi Martin,
On 02.12.2015 16:18, Oleg Fayans wrote:
Hi Martin,
On 12/01/2015 04:08 PM, Martin Basti wrote:
On 27.11.2015 16:26, Oleg Fayans wrote:
And patch N 16 passes lint too:
On 11/27/2015 04:03 PM, Oleg Fayans wrote:
Hi,
On 11/27/2015 03:26 PM, Martin Basti wrote:
On 27.11.2015 15:04, Oleg
Hi Martin,
On 12/01/2015 04:08 PM, Martin Basti wrote:
On 27.11.2015 16:26, Oleg Fayans wrote:
And patch N 16 passes lint too:
On 11/27/2015 04:03 PM, Oleg Fayans wrote:
Hi,
On 11/27/2015 03:26 PM, Martin Basti wrote:
On 27.11.2015 15:04, Oleg Fayans wrote:
Hi Martin,
All your
On 27.11.2015 16:26, Oleg Fayans wrote:
And patch N 16 passes lint too:
On 11/27/2015 04:03 PM, Oleg Fayans wrote:
Hi,
On 11/27/2015 03:26 PM, Martin Basti wrote:
On 27.11.2015 15:04, Oleg Fayans wrote:
Hi Martin,
All your suggestions were taken into account. Both patches are
updated.
On 27.11.2015 15:04, Oleg Fayans wrote:
Hi Martin,
All your suggestions were taken into account. Both patches are
updated. Thank you for your help!
On 11/26/2015 10:50 AM, Martin Basti wrote:
On 26.11.2015 10:04, Oleg Fayans wrote:
Hi Martin,
I agree to all your points but one.
Hi,
On 11/27/2015 03:26 PM, Martin Basti wrote:
On 27.11.2015 15:04, Oleg Fayans wrote:
Hi Martin,
All your suggestions were taken into account. Both patches are
updated. Thank you for your help!
On 11/26/2015 10:50 AM, Martin Basti wrote:
On 26.11.2015 10:04, Oleg Fayans wrote:
Hi
And patch N 16 passes lint too:
On 11/27/2015 04:03 PM, Oleg Fayans wrote:
Hi,
On 11/27/2015 03:26 PM, Martin Basti wrote:
On 27.11.2015 15:04, Oleg Fayans wrote:
Hi Martin,
All your suggestions were taken into account. Both patches are
updated. Thank you for your help!
On 11/26/2015
Hi Martin,
I agree to all your points but one. please, see my comment below
On 11/25/2015 07:42 PM, Martin Basti wrote:
Hi,
0) Note
Please be aware of https://fedorahosted.org/freeipa/ticket/5469 during
KRA testing
1)
Please do not use MIN and MAX_DOMAIN_LEVEL constants, this may change
over
Hi,
Here is the updated version of the patch (more tests + fixed the issues
of the first one) + patch 0017, that implements the necessary changes in
the background code, i. e. patch 16 does not work without patch 17
On 11/18/2015 05:20 PM, Martin Basti wrote:
On 09.11.2015 15:09, Oleg
Hi,
0) Note
Please be aware of https://fedorahosted.org/freeipa/ticket/5469 during
KRA testing
1)
Please do not use MIN and MAX_DOMAIN_LEVEL constants, this may change
over time, use DOMAIN_LEVEL_0 and DOMAIN_LEVEL_1 for domain level 0 and 1
2)
Why uninstall KRA then server, is not enough
On 09.11.2015 17:21, Martin Basti wrote:
On 09.11.2015 15:09, Oleg Fayans wrote:
Hi guys,
Here are first two automated testcases from this (so far incomplete)
testplan: http://www.freeipa.org/page/V4/Replica_Promotion/Test_plan
Testplan review is highly appreciated
Hello,
I did
On 09.11.2015 15:09, Oleg Fayans wrote:
Hi guys,
Here are first two automated testcases from this (so far incomplete)
testplan: http://www.freeipa.org/page/V4/Replica_Promotion/Test_plan
Testplan review is highly appreciated
PATCH 16: NACK
1)
What is the reason to add an unused
Hi guys,
Here are first two automated testcases from this (so far incomplete)
testplan: http://www.freeipa.org/page/V4/Replica_Promotion/Test_plan
Testplan review is highly appreciated
--
Oleg Fayans
Quality Engineer
FreeIPA team
RedHat.
From 4f82f36f28bdb700331bb353b0d3862ec4d14a8e Mon Sep
On 09.11.2015 15:09, Oleg Fayans wrote:
Hi guys,
Here are first two automated testcases from this (so far incomplete)
testplan: http://www.freeipa.org/page/V4/Replica_Promotion/Test_plan
Testplan review is highly appreciated
Hello,
I did not test patch, I just read the testplan, I
18 matches
Mail list logo