On 11/24/2010 03:48 AM, Pavel Zuna wrote:
On 11/19/2010 04:23 PM, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
On Tue, Nov 09, 2010 at 04:55:50AM +0100, Pavel Zůna wrote:
If the parent and child entries have the same attribute as primary
key (such as in the DNS schema), we need to rename the parent key
to prevent a par
On 11/19/2010 04:23 PM, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
On Tue, Nov 09, 2010 at 04:55:50AM +0100, Pavel Zůna wrote:
If the parent and child entries have the same attribute as primary
key (such as in the DNS schema), we need to rename the parent key
to prevent a param name conflict. It has no side effects, b
On Tue, Nov 09, 2010 at 04:55:50AM +0100, Pavel Zůna wrote:
> If the parent and child entries have the same attribute as primary
> key (such as in the DNS schema), we need to rename the parent key
> to prevent a param name conflict. It has no side effects, because
> the primary key name is always t
If the parent and child entries have the same attribute as primary
key (such as in the DNS schema), we need to rename the parent key
to prevent a param name conflict. It has no side effects, because
the primary key name is always taken from the LDAPObject params,
never from the method params.
Pav
