On Tue, 2013-12-17 at 15:03 +0100, Jan Cholasta wrote:
> On 17.12.2013 14:38, Nathaniel McCallum wrote:
> > On Tue, 2013-12-17 at 08:19 +0100, Jan Cholasta wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> On 16.12.2013 22:12, Nathaniel McCallum wrote:
> >>> Patch attached.
> >>
> >> Care to elaborate? There's no ticket o
On 17.12.2013 14:38, Nathaniel McCallum wrote:
On Tue, 2013-12-17 at 08:19 +0100, Jan Cholasta wrote:
Hi,
On 16.12.2013 22:12, Nathaniel McCallum wrote:
Patch attached.
Care to elaborate? There's no ticket or explanation why this is
beneficial or necessary.
It enables compiling with C99 fe
On Tue, 2013-12-17 at 08:47 -0500, Nathaniel McCallum wrote:
> On Tue, 2013-12-17 at 10:29 +0100, Petr Spacek wrote:
> > On 17.12.2013 10:12, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
> > > On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 08:19:09AM +0100, Jan Cholasta wrote:
> > >> Hi,
> > >>
> > >> On 16.12.2013 22:12, Nathaniel McCallum wrot
On Tue, 2013-12-17 at 10:29 +0100, Petr Spacek wrote:
> On 17.12.2013 10:12, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
> > On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 08:19:09AM +0100, Jan Cholasta wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> On 16.12.2013 22:12, Nathaniel McCallum wrote:
> >>> Patch attached.
> >>
> >> Care to elaborate? There's no ticket o
On Tue, 2013-12-17 at 08:19 +0100, Jan Cholasta wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 16.12.2013 22:12, Nathaniel McCallum wrote:
> > Patch attached.
>
> Care to elaborate? There's no ticket or explanation why this is
> beneficial or necessary.
It enables compiling with C99 features, which I personally find very
On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 10:29:03AM +0100, Petr Spacek wrote:
> On 17.12.2013 10:12, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
> >On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 08:19:09AM +0100, Jan Cholasta wrote:
> >>Hi,
> >>
> >>On 16.12.2013 22:12, Nathaniel McCallum wrote:
> >>>Patch attached.
> >>
> >>Care to elaborate? There's no ticket
On 17.12.2013 10:12, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 08:19:09AM +0100, Jan Cholasta wrote:
Hi,
On 16.12.2013 22:12, Nathaniel McCallum wrote:
Patch attached.
Care to elaborate? There's no ticket or explanation why this is
beneficial or necessary.
We had a short chat with Nathan
On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 08:19:09AM +0100, Jan Cholasta wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 16.12.2013 22:12, Nathaniel McCallum wrote:
> >Patch attached.
>
> Care to elaborate? There's no ticket or explanation why this is
> beneficial or necessary.
We had a short chat with Nathaniel yesterday on IRC about which
Hi,
On 16.12.2013 22:12, Nathaniel McCallum wrote:
Patch attached.
Care to elaborate? There's no ticket or explanation why this is
beneficial or necessary.
Honza
--
Jan Cholasta
___
Freeipa-devel mailing list
Freeipa-devel@redhat.com
https://www
Patch attached.
>From e7b631f7d60c539cc48f32f6a750b74c1ef202f7 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Nathaniel McCallum
Date: Mon, 16 Dec 2013 16:10:05 -0500
Subject: [PATCH] Enable building in C99 mode
---
daemons/configure.ac | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/daemons
10 matches
Mail list logo