On 14.01.2016 10:01, Alexander Bokovoy wrote:
On Thu, 14 Jan 2016, Martin Basti wrote:
On 14.01.2016 08:24, Alexander Bokovoy wrote:
On Thu, 03 Dec 2015, Simo Sorce wrote:
The first patch is preparatory and is needed in general now that we
want
top allow alias and use krbCanonicalName as
On 14.01.2016 08:24, Alexander Bokovoy wrote:
On Thu, 03 Dec 2015, Simo Sorce wrote:
The first patch is preparatory and is needed in general now that we want
top allow alias and use krbCanonicalName as the canonical name when
multiple values are avilable in krbPrincipalName.
The second patch
On Thu, 14 Jan 2016, Martin Basti wrote:
On 14.01.2016 08:24, Alexander Bokovoy wrote:
On Thu, 03 Dec 2015, Simo Sorce wrote:
The first patch is preparatory and is needed in general now that we want
top allow alias and use krbCanonicalName as the canonical name when
multiple values are
On Thu, 03 Dec 2015, Simo Sorce wrote:
The first patch is preparatory and is needed in general now that we want
top allow alias and use krbCanonicalName as the canonical name when
multiple values are avilable in krbPrincipalName.
The second patch changes slightly how the interdomain trust
The first patch is preparatory and is needed in general now that we want
top allow alias and use krbCanonicalName as the canonical name when
multiple values are avilable in krbPrincipalName.
The second patch changes slightly how the interdomain trust account is
created so that the getkeytab
On Thu, 03 Dec 2015, Simo Sorce wrote:
The first patch is preparatory and is needed in general now that we want
top allow alias and use krbCanonicalName as the canonical name when
multiple values are avilable in krbPrincipalName.
The second patch changes slightly how the interdomain trust
On Thu, 03 Dec 2015, Simo Sorce wrote:
On Thu, 2015-12-03 at 19:33 +0200, Alexander Bokovoy wrote:
On Thu, 03 Dec 2015, Simo Sorce wrote:
>The first patch is preparatory and is needed in general now that we want
>top allow alias and use krbCanonicalName as the canonical name when
>multiple
