On 23.9.2013 12:08, Petr Viktorin wrote:
On 09/23/2013 09:18 AM, Jan Cholasta wrote:
On 18.9.2013 14:00, Petr Viktorin wrote:
On 09/17/2013 05:13 PM, Jan Cholasta wrote:
On 20.2.2013 17:37, Petr Viktorin wrote:
On 02/19/2013 01:51 PM, Jan Cholasta wrote:
Hi,
On 5.2.2013 18:02, Petr
On 18.9.2013 14:00, Petr Viktorin wrote:
On 09/17/2013 05:13 PM, Jan Cholasta wrote:
On 20.2.2013 17:37, Petr Viktorin wrote:
On 02/19/2013 01:51 PM, Jan Cholasta wrote:
Hi,
On 5.2.2013 18:02, Petr Viktorin wrote:
CIDict, our case-insensitive dictionary, inherits from dict but did
not
On 09/23/2013 09:18 AM, Jan Cholasta wrote:
On 18.9.2013 14:00, Petr Viktorin wrote:
On 09/17/2013 05:13 PM, Jan Cholasta wrote:
On 20.2.2013 17:37, Petr Viktorin wrote:
On 02/19/2013 01:51 PM, Jan Cholasta wrote:
Hi,
On 5.2.2013 18:02, Petr Viktorin wrote:
CIDict, our case-insensitive
On 20.2.2013 17:37, Petr Viktorin wrote:
On 02/19/2013 01:51 PM, Jan Cholasta wrote:
Hi,
On 5.2.2013 18:02, Petr Viktorin wrote:
CIDict, our case-insensitive dictionary, inherits from dict but did not
reimplement the full dict interface. Calling the missing methods
silently invoked
On 02/19/2013 01:51 PM, Jan Cholasta wrote:
Hi,
On 5.2.2013 18:02, Petr Viktorin wrote:
CIDict, our case-insensitive dictionary, inherits from dict but did not
reimplement the full dict interface. Calling the missing methods
silently invoked case-sensitive behavior. Our code seems to avoid
Hi,
On 5.2.2013 18:02, Petr Viktorin wrote:
CIDict, our case-insensitive dictionary, inherits from dict but did not
reimplement the full dict interface. Calling the missing methods
silently invoked case-sensitive behavior. Our code seems to avoid that,
but it's a bit of a minefield for new
CIDict, our case-insensitive dictionary, inherits from dict but did not
reimplement the full dict interface. Calling the missing methods
silently invoked case-sensitive behavior. Our code seems to avoid that,
but it's a bit of a minefield for new development.
Patch 119 adds the missing dict
