[Freeipa-devel] [freeipa PR#638][comment] ipalib/rpc.py: Fix session handling for KEYRING: ccaches

2017-03-23 Thread simo5
URL: https://github.com/freeipa/freeipa/pull/638 Title: #638: ipalib/rpc.py: Fix session handling for KEYRING: ccaches simo5 commented: """ This PR has been obsoleted by #649 """ See the full comment at https://github.com/freeipa/freeipa/pull/638#issuecomment-288850585 -- Manage your subscrip

[Freeipa-devel] [freeipa PR#638][comment] ipalib/rpc.py: Fix session handling for KEYRING: ccaches

2017-03-22 Thread abbra
URL: https://github.com/freeipa/freeipa/pull/638 Title: #638: ipalib/rpc.py: Fix session handling for KEYRING: ccaches abbra commented: """ Yes, KCM will work. However, I wonder if we could use a different approach by storing cookie in a fake ticket with a proper lifetime set to the cookie exp

[Freeipa-devel] [freeipa PR#638][comment] ipalib/rpc.py: Fix session handling for KEYRING: ccaches

2017-03-22 Thread simo5
URL: https://github.com/freeipa/freeipa/pull/638 Title: #638: ipalib/rpc.py: Fix session handling for KEYRING: ccaches simo5 commented: """ One way to deal with this in the FILE case is to copy the ccache to a tmp file and then rename to the original one. There is a risk of racing and removing

[Freeipa-devel] [freeipa PR#638][comment] ipalib/rpc.py: Fix session handling for KEYRING: ccaches

2017-03-22 Thread abbra
URL: https://github.com/freeipa/freeipa/pull/638 Title: #638: ipalib/rpc.py: Fix session handling for KEYRING: ccaches abbra commented: """ Note: this is WIP, please test it against KEYRING: ccaches. """ See the full comment at https://github.com/freeipa/freeipa/pull/638#issuecomment-288402486