On Thu, 2012-05-31 at 12:36 +0200, Petr Spacek wrote:
> On 05/25/2012 02:41 PM, Adam Tkac wrote:
> > On Mon, May 07, 2012 at 10:29:12PM +0200, Petr Spacek wrote:
> >> Hello,
> >>
> >> on the last meeting there was another approach to $SUBJ$ discussed:
> >>
> >> Each DNS server will maintain its own
On 05/25/2012 02:41 PM, Adam Tkac wrote:
On Mon, May 07, 2012 at 10:29:12PM +0200, Petr Spacek wrote:
Hello,
on the last meeting there was another approach to $SUBJ$ discussed:
Each DNS server will maintain its own serial number value
independently from other servers.
Pros:
Should be simpler
On Mon, May 07, 2012 at 10:29:12PM +0200, Petr Spacek wrote:
> Hello,
>
> on the last meeting there was another approach to $SUBJ$ discussed:
>
> Each DNS server will maintain its own serial number value
> independently from other servers.
>
> Pros:
> Should be simpler to implement; no DS plugin
Hello,
on the last meeting there was another approach to $SUBJ$ discussed:
Each DNS server will maintain its own serial number value independently from
other servers.
Pros:
Should be simpler to implement; no DS plugin required.
Cons:
Slave DNS servers cannot fall-back to other masters, becau
