On 10/26/2010 04:47 PM, Simo Sorce wrote:
On Tue, 26 Oct 2010 16:26:13 -0400
Adam Youngayo...@redhat.com wrote:
I'll admit this would be useful, but it would be another process that
we don't have now, that I was trying to avoid. We all have git repos
on fedorapeople. The trick is to
Made a change based on a recommendation by Simo: proejct name now
leads, followed by user name.
Posted on the wiki here:
http://fedorahosted.org/freeipa/wiki/PatchFormat
___
Freeipa-devel mailing list
Freeipa-devel@redhat.com
On Tue, 26 Oct 2010 13:40:11 -0400
Adam Young ayo...@redhat.com wrote:
We've been doing this informally for a while, and I think, if we all
agree to the format, it will help keep track of patches, ACKs, and
commits.
1. Patch naming
Example patch name:
On Tue, 26 Oct 2010 14:22:01 -0400
Adam Young ayo...@redhat.com wrote:
On 10/26/2010 02:08 PM, Simo Sorce wrote:
On Tue, 26 Oct 2010 13:40:11 -0400
Adam Youngayo...@redhat.com wrote:
We've been doing this informally for a while, and I think, if we
all agree to the format, it
On 10/26/2010 03:29 PM, Simo Sorce wrote:
On Tue, 26 Oct 2010 14:22:01 -0400
Adam Youngayo...@redhat.com wrote:
On 10/26/2010 02:08 PM, Simo Sorce wrote:
On Tue, 26 Oct 2010 13:40:11 -0400
Adam Youngayo...@redhat.com wrote:
We've been doing this informally for a while,
On Tue, 26 Oct 2010 16:26:13 -0400
Adam Young ayo...@redhat.com wrote:
I'll admit this would be useful, but it would be another process that
we don't have now, that I was trying to avoid. We all have git repos
on fedorapeople. The trick is to deal with patches that have to get
changed