On 06/10/2015 02:42 PM, thierry bordaz wrote:
On 06/10/2015 02:19 PM, Ludwig Krispenz wrote:
On 06/10/2015 02:13 PM, thierry bordaz wrote:
On 06/10/2015 10:51 AM, Ludwig Krispenz wrote:
On 06/10/2015 10:41 AM, Martin Basti wrote:
On 10/06/15 09:13, Ludwig Krispenz wrote:
Hi,
there seems t
On 06/10/2015 02:19 PM, Ludwig Krispenz wrote:
On 06/10/2015 02:13 PM, thierry bordaz wrote:
On 06/10/2015 10:51 AM, Ludwig Krispenz wrote:
On 06/10/2015 10:41 AM, Martin Basti wrote:
On 10/06/15 09:13, Ludwig Krispenz wrote:
Hi,
there seems to be somethin going wrong in the code to delete
On 06/10/2015 02:13 PM, thierry bordaz wrote:
On 06/10/2015 10:51 AM, Ludwig Krispenz wrote:
On 06/10/2015 10:41 AM, Martin Basti wrote:
On 10/06/15 09:13, Ludwig Krispenz wrote:
Hi,
there seems to be somethin going wrong in the code to delete the
services.
The code is:
# delete
On 06/10/2015 10:51 AM, Ludwig Krispenz wrote:
On 06/10/2015 10:41 AM, Martin Basti wrote:
On 10/06/15 09:13, Ludwig Krispenz wrote:
Hi,
there seems to be somethin going wrong in the code to delete the
services.
The code is:
# delete master entry with all active services
t
On 06/10/2015 10:41 AM, Martin Basti wrote:
On 10/06/15 09:13, Ludwig Krispenz wrote:
Hi,
there seems to be somethin going wrong in the code to delete the
services.
The code is:
# delete master entry with all active services
try:
dn = DN(('cn', replica), ('cn',
On 10/06/15 09:13, Ludwig Krispenz wrote:
Hi,
there seems to be somethin going wrong in the code to delete the
services.
The code is:
# delete master entry with all active services
try:
dn = DN(('cn', replica), ('cn', 'masters'), ('cn', 'ipa'),
Hi,
there seems to be somethin going wrong in the code to delete the services.
The code is:
# delete master entry with all active services
try:
dn = DN(('cn', replica), ('cn', 'masters'), ('cn', 'ipa'),
('cn', 'etc'), self.suffix)
entr
On 06/09/2015 05:32 PM, Ludwig Krispenz wrote:
Hi Oleg,
thanks for access to your machine, the replication agreements are
still there - and that is expected since the server was not removed.
In the access log I see:
[09/Jun/2015:08:32:42 -0400] conn=150 op=52 SRCH
base="cn=f22replica1.baga
Hi Oleg,
thanks for access to your machine, the replication agreements are still
there - and that is expected since the server was not removed.
In the access log I see:
[09/Jun/2015:08:32:42 -0400] conn=150 op=52 SRCH
base="cn=f22replica1.bagam.net,cn=masters,cn=ipa,cn=etc,dc=bagam,dc=net"
s
On 06/09/2015 04:25 PM, Oleg Fayans wrote:
On 06/09/2015 04:19 PM, Ludwig Krispenz wrote:
On 06/09/2015 04:14 PM, Oleg Fayans wrote:
On 06/09/2015 04:04 PM, Ludwig Krispenz wrote:
On 06/09/2015 03:55 PM, Oleg Fayans wrote:
Hi everybody,
The current status of Topology plugin testing is
Simo, yep, I entered the name manually when writing this letter
On 06/09/2015 04:28 PM, Simo Sorce wrote:
On Tue, 2015-06-09 at 16:25 +0200, Oleg Fayans wrote:
Then, after issuing `ipa-replica-manage-del f2replica1.bagam.net
Is this a copy and paste error or the command you actually used ?
(re
On Tue, 2015-06-09 at 16:25 +0200, Oleg Fayans wrote:
> Then, after issuing `ipa-replica-manage-del f2replica1.bagam.net
Is this a copy and paste error or the command you actually used ?
(replica name is wrong).
Simo.
--
Simo Sorce * Red Hat, Inc * New York
--
Manage your subscription for th
On 06/09/2015 04:19 PM, Ludwig Krispenz wrote:
On 06/09/2015 04:14 PM, Oleg Fayans wrote:
On 06/09/2015 04:04 PM, Ludwig Krispenz wrote:
On 06/09/2015 03:55 PM, Oleg Fayans wrote:
Hi everybody,
The current status of Topology plugin testing is as follows:
1. There is still no proper way
On 06/09/2015 04:14 PM, Oleg Fayans wrote:
On 06/09/2015 04:04 PM, Ludwig Krispenz wrote:
On 06/09/2015 03:55 PM, Oleg Fayans wrote:
Hi everybody,
The current status of Topology plugin testing is as follows:
1. There is still no proper way of removing the replica.
Standard procedure using
On 06/09/2015 04:04 PM, Ludwig Krispenz wrote:
On 06/09/2015 03:55 PM, Oleg Fayans wrote:
Hi everybody,
The current status of Topology plugin testing is as follows:
1. There is still no proper way of removing the replica.
Standard procedure using `ipa-replica-manage del` throws "Server is
On 06/09/2015 03:55 PM, Oleg Fayans wrote:
Hi everybody,
The current status of Topology plugin testing is as follows:
1. There is still no proper way of removing the replica.
Standard procedure using `ipa-replica-manage del` throws "Server is
unwilling to perform: Entry is managed by topology
Hi everybody,
The current status of Topology plugin testing is as follows:
1. There is still no proper way of removing the replica.
Standard procedure using `ipa-replica-manage del` throws "Server is
unwilling to perform: Entry is managed by topology plugin.Deletion not
allowed.". The replicat
17 matches
Mail list logo
