[Freeipa-devel] [freeipa PR#876][comment] python-netifaces: update to reflect upstream changes

2017-06-16 Thread MartinBasti via FreeIPA-devel
  URL: https://github.com/freeipa/freeipa/pull/876
Title: #876: python-netifaces: update to reflect upstream changes

MartinBasti commented:
"""
@martbab should work with both versions, I don't want to bump requires for this
@pvoborni It could, I'll update PR
"""

See the full comment at 
https://github.com/freeipa/freeipa/pull/876#issuecomment-309011126
___
FreeIPA-devel mailing list -- freeipa-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org
To unsubscribe send an email to freeipa-devel-le...@lists.fedorahosted.org


[Freeipa-devel] [freeipa PR#876][comment] python-netifaces: update to reflect upstream changes

2017-06-16 Thread pvoborni via FreeIPA-devel
  URL: https://github.com/freeipa/freeipa/pull/876
Title: #876: python-netifaces: update to reflect upstream changes

pvoborni commented:
"""
Could the checked addresses(input from netifaces) be logged? It is easier to 
debug if something goes wrong.


"""

See the full comment at 
https://github.com/freeipa/freeipa/pull/876#issuecomment-309009672
___
FreeIPA-devel mailing list -- freeipa-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org
To unsubscribe send an email to freeipa-devel-le...@lists.fedorahosted.org


[Freeipa-devel] [freeipa PR#876][comment] python-netifaces: update to reflect upstream changes

2017-06-16 Thread martbab via FreeIPA-devel
  URL: https://github.com/freeipa/freeipa/pull/876
Title: #876: python-netifaces: update to reflect upstream changes

martbab commented:
"""
Shouldn't we bump requires on python-netifaces so that we don't accidentally 
pull in the older version that can break this new code?
"""

See the full comment at 
https://github.com/freeipa/freeipa/pull/876#issuecomment-309006143
___
FreeIPA-devel mailing list -- freeipa-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org
To unsubscribe send an email to freeipa-devel-le...@lists.fedorahosted.org