[Freeipa-devel] [PATCH] 0257-containing-entity-pkeys

2011-06-29 Thread Adam Young
Better solution than the algorithm in 256 for nested entities. ___ Freeipa-devel mailing list Freeipa-devel@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/freeipa-devel

Re: [Freeipa-devel] [PATCH] 0257-containing-entity-pkeys

2011-06-29 Thread Adam Young
On 06/29/2011 09:37 AM, Adam Young wrote: Better solution than the algorithm in 256 for nested entities. ___ Freeipa-devel mailing list Freeipa-devel@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/freeipa-devel From

Re: [Freeipa-devel] [PATCH] 0257-containing-entity-pkeys

2011-06-29 Thread Adam Young
On 06/29/2011 10:34 AM, Adam Young wrote: On 06/29/2011 09:37 AM, Adam Young wrote: Better solution than the algorithm in 256 for nested entities. ___ Freeipa-devel mailing list Freeipa-devel@redhat.com

Re: [Freeipa-devel] [PATCH] 0257-containing-entity-pkeys

2011-06-29 Thread Endi Sukma Dewata
On 6/29/2011 11:30 AM, Adam Young wrote: On 06/29/2011 10:34 AM, Adam Young wrote: On 06/29/2011 09:37 AM, Adam Young wrote: Better solution than the algorithm in 256 for nested entities. Changes for Hyphen and pkey names Some issues: 1. This statement will store undefined values into

[Freeipa-devel] [PATCH] 811 Set the client auth callback after creating the SSL connection.

2011-06-29 Thread Rob Crittenden
If we set the callback before calling connect() then if the connection tries a network family type and fails, it will try other family types. If this happens then the callback set on the first socket will be lost when a new socket is created. There is no way to query for the callback in an

[Freeipa-devel] [PATCH] 812 Use RunAs in labels, not Run As

2011-06-29 Thread Rob Crittenden
For consistency we should use RunAs in sudo labels and not Run As. The API changes don't affect the wire API, label is in there to make one think twice about making changes :-) https://fedorahosted.org/freeipa/ticket/1328 From 59b9918c69fabd71b6e4e97b09799b65e47591cb Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001

[Freeipa-devel] Proposal: drop DENY rules from HBAC

2011-06-29 Thread Stephen Gallagher
We discussed today on the FreeIPA status meeting the possibility of dropping support for DENY rules from the HBAC specification. I'm submitting it for discussion. Specifically, I'm looking to hear whether there any any FreeIPA admins out there that have a strong opinion on whether the DENY rules

Re: [Freeipa-devel] [PATCH] 811 Set the client auth callback after creating the SSL connection.

2011-06-29 Thread John Dennis
On 06/29/2011 03:08 PM, Rob Crittenden wrote: If we set the callback before calling connect() then if the connection tries a network family type and fails, it will try other family types. If this happens then the callback set on the first socket will be lost when a new socket is created. There

[Freeipa-devel] [PATCH] 0258-undefined-pkeys

2011-06-29 Thread Adam Young
From ee37bd5442b01deddff162539b6f828c77bade59 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Adam Young ayo...@redhat.com Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2011 13:42:13 -0400 Subject: [PATCH] undefined pkeys https://fedorahosted.org/freeipa/ticket/1399 Thereis not metatdata defined pkey for config, so we need to short

Re: [Freeipa-devel] Proposal: drop DENY rules from HBAC

2011-06-29 Thread Jakub Hrozek
On 06/29/2011 04:00 PM, Stephen Gallagher wrote: We discussed today on the FreeIPA status meeting the possibility of dropping support for DENY rules from the HBAC specification. I'm submitting it for discussion. Specifically, I'm looking to hear whether there any any FreeIPA admins out there

Re: [Freeipa-devel] [PATCH] 0257-containing-entity-pkeys

2011-06-29 Thread Adam Young
On 06/29/2011 12:52 PM, Endi Sukma Dewata wrote: On 6/29/2011 11:30 AM, Adam Young wrote: On 06/29/2011 10:34 AM, Adam Young wrote: On 06/29/2011 09:37 AM, Adam Young wrote: Better solution than the algorithm in 256 for nested entities. Changes for Hyphen and pkey names Some issues: 1.

Re: [Freeipa-devel] [PATCH] 811 Set the client auth callback after creating the SSL connection.

2011-06-29 Thread Rob Crittenden
John Dennis wrote: On 06/29/2011 03:08 PM, Rob Crittenden wrote: If we set the callback before calling connect() then if the connection tries a network family type and fails, it will try other family types. If this happens then the callback set on the first socket will be lost when a new socket

Re: [Freeipa-devel] [PATCH] 0257-containing-entity-pkeys

2011-06-29 Thread Adam Young
On 06/29/2011 04:47 PM, Adam Young wrote: On 06/29/2011 12:52 PM, Endi Sukma Dewata wrote: On 6/29/2011 11:30 AM, Adam Young wrote: On 06/29/2011 10:34 AM, Adam Young wrote: On 06/29/2011 09:37 AM, Adam Young wrote: Better solution than the algorithm in 256 for nested entities. Changes for

Re: [Freeipa-devel] Proposal: drop DENY rules from HBAC

2011-06-29 Thread Simo Sorce
On Wed, 2011-06-29 at 16:25 -0400, Jakub Hrozek wrote: On 06/29/2011 04:00 PM, Stephen Gallagher wrote: We discussed today on the FreeIPA status meeting the possibility of dropping support for DENY rules from the HBAC specification. I'm submitting it for discussion. Specifically, I'm

Re: [Freeipa-devel] [PATCH] 0258-undefined-pkeys

2011-06-29 Thread Endi Sukma Dewata
On 6/29/2011 3:24 PM, Adam Young wrote: ACK and pushed to master. -- Endi S. Dewata ___ Freeipa-devel mailing list Freeipa-devel@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/freeipa-devel

Re: [Freeipa-devel] Proposal: drop DENY rules from HBAC

2011-06-29 Thread Dmitri Pal
I think that an explicit allow list is usually way better because with deny rules it's easy to fail to enumerate all entities that should be denied, resulting in allowing access we didn't want to. However, does anyone still remember why we opted for deny rules during design phase in the

Re: [Freeipa-devel] [PATCH]0259-config-fields

2011-06-29 Thread Adam Young
On 06/29/2011 10:28 PM, Adam Young wrote: See attached screenshot ___ Freeipa-devel mailing list Freeipa-devel@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/freeipa-devel https://fedorahosted.org/freeipa/ticket/1406 as well