On 29.07.2011 07:41, Rob Crittenden wrote:
Alexander Bokovoy wrote:
On 29.07.2011 06:38, Alexander Bokovoy wrote:
Fixed that all and added unit test for non-existing rules.
Modified description to be more detailed and added real examples.
Scratch previous version, while nicely renaming unit
Alexander Bokovoy wrote:
On 29.07.2011 07:41, Rob Crittenden wrote:
Alexander Bokovoy wrote:
On 29.07.2011 06:38, Alexander Bokovoy wrote:
Fixed that all and added unit test for non-existing rules.
Modified description to be more detailed and added real examples.
Scratch previous version,
Alexander Bokovoy wrote:
On 27.07.2011 18:37, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
On 07/27/2011 03:12 PM, Alexander Bokovoy wrote:
+for ipa_rule in rules:
+try:
+res = request.evaluate([ipa_rule])
+if res == pyhbac.HBAC_EVAL_ALLOW:
+
On 29.07.2011 06:38, Alexander Bokovoy wrote:
Fixed that all and added unit test for non-existing rules.
Modified description to be more detailed and added real examples.
Scratch previous version, while nicely renaming unit tests before commit
and after patch testing I didn't keep right order of
Alexander Bokovoy wrote:
On 29.07.2011 06:38, Alexander Bokovoy wrote:
Fixed that all and added unit test for non-existing rules.
Modified description to be more detailed and added real examples.
Scratch previous version, while nicely renaming unit tests before commit
and after patch testing I
On 26.07.2011 22:55, Dmitri Pal wrote:
The tests imply that there are deny rules. We removed them so very soon
there would be no deny rules. Should the results of the test show
something like:
--
Access granted : True
--
Granted by:
On 07/27/2011 03:12 PM, Alexander Bokovoy wrote:
+for ipa_rule in rules:
+try:
+res = request.evaluate([ipa_rule])
+if res == pyhbac.HBAC_EVAL_ALLOW:
+matched_rules.append(ipa_rule.name)
+
