On Thu, 2011-05-05 at 07:56 -0400, Simo Sorce wrote:
On Thu, 2011-05-05 at 12:29 +0200, Martin Kosek wrote:
On Wed, 2011-05-04 at 17:16 -0400, Simo Sorce wrote:
On Wed, 2011-05-04 at 16:57 -0400, Simo Sorce wrote:
On Wed, 2011-05-04 at 17:12 +0200, Martin Kosek wrote:
On Wed,
On Fri, 2011-05-06 at 16:00 +0200, Martin Kosek wrote:
Yeah, that's exactly the issue I am experiencing. Anyway, I think we are
safe with this change even with the bug 699027 as we don't use
`chkconfig $SERVICE` to confirm a change to service boot status.
Yep, that's why I am comfortable with
On Fri, 2011-05-06 at 10:06 -0400, Simo Sorce wrote:
On Fri, 2011-05-06 at 16:00 +0200, Martin Kosek wrote:
Yeah, that's exactly the issue I am experiencing. Anyway, I think we are
safe with this change even with the bug 699027 as we don't use
`chkconfig $SERVICE` to confirm a change to
On Thu, 2011-05-05 at 12:29 +0200, Martin Kosek wrote:
On Wed, 2011-05-04 at 17:16 -0400, Simo Sorce wrote:
On Wed, 2011-05-04 at 16:57 -0400, Simo Sorce wrote:
On Wed, 2011-05-04 at 17:12 +0200, Martin Kosek wrote:
On Wed, 2011-05-04 at 11:01 -0400, Simo Sorce wrote:
On Wed,
The chkconfig --list option is not reliable as it works differently on a
F15 system with systemd enabled services, avoid using it as we have
alternative better ways.
Simo.
--
Simo Sorce * Red Hat, Inc * New York
From a7252afb01770efd5c7884752811ce859893a004 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Simo
On Wed, 2011-05-04 at 10:28 -0400, Simo Sorce wrote:
The chkconfig --list option is not reliable as it works differently on a
F15 system with systemd enabled services, avoid using it as we have
alternative better ways.
Simo.
NACK. This breaks the installation:
# ipa-server-install
...
On Wed, 2011-05-04 at 16:56 +0200, Martin Kosek wrote:
On Wed, 2011-05-04 at 10:28 -0400, Simo Sorce wrote:
The chkconfig --list option is not reliable as it works differently on a
F15 system with systemd enabled services, avoid using it as we have
alternative better ways.
Simo.
On Wed, 2011-05-04 at 17:12 +0200, Martin Kosek wrote:
On Wed, 2011-05-04 at 11:01 -0400, Simo Sorce wrote:
On Wed, 2011-05-04 at 16:56 +0200, Martin Kosek wrote:
On Wed, 2011-05-04 at 10:28 -0400, Simo Sorce wrote:
The chkconfig --list option is not reliable as it works differently on a
On Wed, 2011-05-04 at 16:57 -0400, Simo Sorce wrote:
On Wed, 2011-05-04 at 17:12 +0200, Martin Kosek wrote:
On Wed, 2011-05-04 at 11:01 -0400, Simo Sorce wrote:
On Wed, 2011-05-04 at 16:56 +0200, Martin Kosek wrote:
On Wed, 2011-05-04 at 10:28 -0400, Simo Sorce wrote:
The chkconfig
On Wed, 2011-05-04 at 17:16 -0400, Simo Sorce wrote:
After the conversation here [1] and after looking more closely at how
Here I meant to link to this bug:
[1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=702003
--
Simo Sorce * Red Hat, Inc * New York
10 matches
Mail list logo
