Since this branch became somewhat unwieldy, here's a quick summary.
Patches are pushed to master (1d3ddef~..bef251a).
Martin's patch was also pushed to 3.0 (83d2822) and 2.2 (18b873c).
This fixes ipa-replica-manage to only manage the IPA agreements, not the
PKI ones.
There is an outstanding
On 11/23/2012 01:44 PM, Petr Viktorin wrote:
Since this branch became somewhat unwieldy, here's a quick summary.
Patches are pushed to master (1d3ddef~..bef251a).
Martin's patch was also pushed to 3.0 (83d2822) and 2.2 (18b873c).
This fixes ipa-replica-manage to only manage the IPA
Petr Viktorin wrote:
On 11/01/2012 06:34 PM, Petr Viktorin wrote:
On 11/01/2012 06:33 PM, Petr Viktorin wrote:
On 10/29/2012 04:48 PM, Petr Viktorin wrote:
On 10/26/2012 02:25 PM, Petr Viktorin wrote:
On 10/26/2012 02:20 PM, Petr Viktorin wrote:
Attached are this thread's patches rebased
On 11/01/2012 06:34 PM, Petr Viktorin wrote:
On 11/01/2012 06:33 PM, Petr Viktorin wrote:
On 10/29/2012 04:48 PM, Petr Viktorin wrote:
On 10/26/2012 02:25 PM, Petr Viktorin wrote:
On 10/26/2012 02:20 PM, Petr Viktorin wrote:
Attached are this thread's patches rebased and squashed into one.
On 10/29/2012 04:48 PM, Petr Viktorin wrote:
On 10/26/2012 02:25 PM, Petr Viktorin wrote:
On 10/26/2012 02:20 PM, Petr Viktorin wrote:
Attached are this thread's patches rebased and squashed into one.
... and here is a patch to address replication problems related to
merging the schemata of
On 11/01/2012 06:33 PM, Petr Viktorin wrote:
On 10/29/2012 04:48 PM, Petr Viktorin wrote:
On 10/26/2012 02:25 PM, Petr Viktorin wrote:
On 10/26/2012 02:20 PM, Petr Viktorin wrote:
Attached are this thread's patches rebased and squashed into one.
... and here is a patch to address
On 10/26/2012 02:25 PM, Petr Viktorin wrote:
On 10/26/2012 02:20 PM, Petr Viktorin wrote:
Attached are this thread's patches rebased and squashed into one.
... and here is a patch to address replication problems related to
merging the schemata of the IPA and CA databases. See the commit
Attached are this thread's patches rebased and squashed into one.
--
Petr³
From e88d69814dad88e68cfa8b66e60e58477cecdc04 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Ade Lee a...@redhat.com
Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2012 23:35:42 -0400
Subject: [PATCH] Changes to use a single database for dogtag and IPA
New servers
On 10/26/2012 02:20 PM, Petr Viktorin wrote:
Attached are this thread's patches rebased and squashed into one.
... and here is a patch to address replication problems related to
merging the schemata of the IPA and CA databases. See the commit message
for details.
On 10/05/2012 09:24 PM, Ade Lee wrote:
Agreed with your assessment that the --check-ca is not needed, as we
will be checking this into 3.1 (and not 3.0).
Attaching patch that does this. It also removes the unneeded
--dogtag-master-ds-port option. I'll squash it into the big patch later.
On 10/04/2012 10:04 PM, Ade Lee wrote:
Attached is a patch to handle the ipa-replica-conncheck issue. It
should be applied on top of your patch.
Essentially, the fix is as follows:
A. If the DS_PORT = 7389, then we pass --check-ca in the
ipa-replica-conncheck to be executed on the master.
a1.
Agreed with your assessment that the --check-ca is not needed, as we
will be checking this into 3.1 (and not 3.0).
Attached is a patch for the request object issue. Basically, the
replication was not working because ipa-replica-prepare was passing in
the wrong port when creating the replica
On 10/01/2012 05:02 PM, Ade Lee wrote:
On Mon, 2012-10-01 at 16:09 +0200, Martin Kosek wrote:
On 10/01/2012 03:35 PM, Petr Viktorin wrote:
On 09/27/2012 10:26 AM, Petr Viktorin wrote:
On 09/20/2012 05:58 AM, Ade Lee wrote:
Changes to use a single database for dogtag and IPA
New
On 10/02/2012 03:02 PM, Petr Viktorin wrote:
On 10/01/2012 05:02 PM, Ade Lee wrote:
On Mon, 2012-10-01 at 16:09 +0200, Martin Kosek wrote:
On 10/01/2012 03:35 PM, Petr Viktorin wrote:
On 09/27/2012 10:26 AM, Petr Viktorin wrote:
On 09/20/2012 05:58 AM, Ade Lee wrote:
Changes to use a single
On 09/27/2012 10:26 AM, Petr Viktorin wrote:
On 09/20/2012 05:58 AM, Ade Lee wrote:
Changes to use a single database for dogtag and IPA
New servers that are installed with dogtag 10 instances will use
a single database instance for dogtag and IPA, albeit with different
suffixes.
On 10/01/2012 03:35 PM, Petr Viktorin wrote:
On 09/27/2012 10:26 AM, Petr Viktorin wrote:
On 09/20/2012 05:58 AM, Ade Lee wrote:
Changes to use a single database for dogtag and IPA
New servers that are installed with dogtag 10 instances will use
a single database instance for
On Mon, 2012-10-01 at 16:09 +0200, Martin Kosek wrote:
On 10/01/2012 03:35 PM, Petr Viktorin wrote:
On 09/27/2012 10:26 AM, Petr Viktorin wrote:
On 09/20/2012 05:58 AM, Ade Lee wrote:
Changes to use a single database for dogtag and IPA
New servers that are installed with dogtag 10
On 09/20/2012 05:58 AM, Ade Lee wrote:
Changes to use a single database for dogtag and IPA
New servers that are installed with dogtag 10 instances will use
a single database instance for dogtag and IPA, albeit with different
suffixes. Dogtag will communicate with the instance
Changes to use a single database for dogtag and IPA
New servers that are installed with dogtag 10 instances will use
a single database instance for dogtag and IPA, albeit with different
suffixes. Dogtag will communicate with the instance through a
database user with
19 matches
Mail list logo
