URL: https://github.com/freeipa/freeipa/pull/469
Title: #469: Ignore unlink error in ipa-otpd.socket
npmccallum commented:
"""
This PR can be closed.
"""
See the full comment at
https://github.com/freeipa/freeipa/pull/469#issuecomment-280660092
--
Manage your subscription for the Freeipa-deve
URL: https://github.com/freeipa/freeipa/pull/469
Title: #469: Ignore unlink error in ipa-otpd.socket
npmccallum commented:
"""
We shouldn't use either. We should use RemoveOnStop= now.
"""
See the full comment at
https://github.com/freeipa/freeipa/pull/469#issuecomment-280657734
--
Manage you
URL: https://github.com/freeipa/freeipa/pull/469
Title: #469: Ignore unlink error in ipa-otpd.socket
simo5 commented:
"""
@tiran I do not know, @npmccallum may know.
"""
See the full comment at
https://github.com/freeipa/freeipa/pull/469#issuecomment-280656899
--
Manage your subscription for
URL: https://github.com/freeipa/freeipa/pull/469
Title: #469: Ignore unlink error in ipa-otpd.socket
tiran commented:
"""
Would you rather use ```/usr/bin/rm -f``` to only ignore missing files but
propagate permission errors? I'm not sure why unlink was used in favor of rm.
@simo5 ?
"""
See t
URL: https://github.com/freeipa/freeipa/pull/469
Title: #469: Ignore unlink error in ipa-otpd.socket
HonzaCholasta commented:
"""
This will ignore all errors, not just file does not exist. Are we OK with that?
"""
See the full comment at
https://github.com/freeipa/freeipa/pull/469#issuecomment
URL: https://github.com/freeipa/freeipa/pull/469
Title: #469: Ignore unlink error in ipa-otpd.socket
martbab commented:
"""
LGTM, but do we require this fix also in 4-4 branch?
"""
See the full comment at
https://github.com/freeipa/freeipa/pull/469#issuecomment-280285004
--
Manage your subscr