[Freeipa-devel] [freeipa PR#510][comment] Vault: port key wrapping to python-cryptography

2017-03-02 Thread MartinBasti
URL: https://github.com/freeipa/freeipa/pull/510 Title: #510: Vault: port key wrapping to python-cryptography MartinBasti commented: """ master: * ed7a03a1af8b556247b929635e2972be4f2b32e4 Vault: port key wrapping to python-cryptography """ See the full comment at

[Freeipa-devel] [freeipa PR#510][comment] Vault: port key wrapping to python-cryptography

2017-03-02 Thread stlaz
URL: https://github.com/freeipa/freeipa/pull/510 Title: #510: Vault: port key wrapping to python-cryptography stlaz commented: """ Tested this and gone through the code, both was fine. ACK. """ See the full comment at https://github.com/freeipa/freeipa/pull/510#issuecomment-283603907 --

[Freeipa-devel] [freeipa PR#510][comment] Vault: port key wrapping to python-cryptography

2017-02-27 Thread tiran
URL: https://github.com/freeipa/freeipa/pull/510 Title: #510: Vault: port key wrapping to python-cryptography tiran commented: """ I can answer the question myself. The side channel attack on RSAEP PKCS1 v1.5 is a chosen-ciphertext attack Bleichenbacher attack. It applies to unpadding and RSA

[Freeipa-devel] [freeipa PR#510][comment] Vault: port key wrapping to python-cryptography

2017-02-27 Thread tiran
URL: https://github.com/freeipa/freeipa/pull/510 Title: #510: Vault: port key wrapping to python-cryptography tiran commented: """ @simo5 Do I remember correctly that PKCS1v1.5 side channel attacks applies only to unpadding and not to padding? """ See the full comment at