On 17.10.2016 17:55, Simo Sorce wrote:
> On Mon, 2016-10-17 at 09:02 +0200, Petr Spacek wrote:
>> On 27.9.2016 14:31, Jan Pazdziora wrote:
>>> On Wed, Sep 21, 2016 at 12:01:44PM +0200, Jan Pazdziora wrote:
I've recently hit again the situation of IPA installer not happy
about the pro
On Mon, 2016-10-17 at 09:02 +0200, Petr Spacek wrote:
> On 27.9.2016 14:31, Jan Pazdziora wrote:
> > On Wed, Sep 21, 2016 at 12:01:44PM +0200, Jan Pazdziora wrote:
> >>
> >> I've recently hit again the situation of IPA installer not happy
> >> about the provided IP address not being local to it, th
On 27.9.2016 14:31, Jan Pazdziora wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 21, 2016 at 12:01:44PM +0200, Jan Pazdziora wrote:
>>
>> I've recently hit again the situation of IPA installer not happy
>> about the provided IP address not being local to it, this time in
>> containerized environment:
>>
>> https://bugz
On Wed, Sep 21, 2016 at 12:01:44PM +0200, Jan Pazdziora wrote:
>
> I've recently hit again the situation of IPA installer not happy
> about the provided IP address not being local to it, this time in
> containerized environment:
>
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1377973
>
> D
On 21.09.2016 12:01, Jan Pazdziora wrote:
Hello,
I've recently hit again the situation of IPA installer not happy
about the provided IP address not being local to it, this time in
containerized environment:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1377973
During the discussion, we
Hello,
I've recently hit again the situation of IPA installer not happy
about the provided IP address not being local to it, this time in
containerized environment:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1377973
During the discussion, we came to an interesting question:
Wh