On Fri, 2016-07-15 at 14:29 +0200, Stanislav Laznicka wrote:
> On 07/15/2016 02:10 PM, Simo Sorce wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, 2016-05-18 at 15:28 +0200, Stanislav Laznicka wrote:
> > >
> > > On 05/18/2016 02:19 PM, Alexander Bokovoy wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Wed, 18 May 2016, Stanislav Laznicka
On 07/15/2016 02:10 PM, Simo Sorce wrote:
On Wed, 2016-05-18 at 15:28 +0200, Stanislav Laznicka wrote:
On 05/18/2016 02:19 PM, Alexander Bokovoy wrote:
On Wed, 18 May 2016, Stanislav Laznicka wrote:
when removal succeeds but addition fails for some reason?
The
operation is not atomic anymore.
On Wed, 2016-05-18 at 15:28 +0200, Stanislav Laznicka wrote:
> On 05/18/2016 02:19 PM, Alexander Bokovoy wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, 18 May 2016, Stanislav Laznicka wrote:
> > >
> > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > when removal succeeds but addition fails for some reason?
> > > > > The
> > > > > operation
On Wed, May 18, 2016 at 05:13:11PM +0300, Alexander Bokovoy wrote:
> On Wed, 18 May 2016, Stanislav Laznicka wrote:
> > On 05/18/2016 02:19 PM, Alexander Bokovoy wrote:
> > > On Wed, 18 May 2016, Stanislav Laznicka wrote:
> > > > > > when removal succeeds but addition fails for some
> > > > > >
On 18.05.2016 16:13, Alexander Bokovoy wrote:
On Wed, 18 May 2016, Stanislav Laznicka wrote:
On 05/18/2016 02:19 PM, Alexander Bokovoy wrote:
On Wed, 18 May 2016, Stanislav Laznicka wrote:
when removal succeeds but addition fails for some reason? The
operation is not atomic anymore.
We
On Wed, 18 May 2016, Stanislav Laznicka wrote:
On 05/18/2016 02:19 PM, Alexander Bokovoy wrote:
On Wed, 18 May 2016, Stanislav Laznicka wrote:
when removal succeeds but addition fails for some reason? The
operation is not atomic anymore.
We offline-discussed this with Honza. There should
On 05/18/2016 02:19 PM, Alexander Bokovoy wrote:
On Wed, 18 May 2016, Stanislav Laznicka wrote:
when removal succeeds but addition fails for some reason? The
operation is not atomic anymore.
We offline-discussed this with Honza. There should be a new command
`ipa
On Wed, 18 May 2016, Stanislav Laznicka wrote:
when removal succeeds but addition fails for some reason? The
operation is not atomic anymore.
We offline-discussed this with Honza. There should be a new command
`ipa hbacrule-replace-accesstime rule_name --orig-time=icalstr1
On 05/18/2016 01:47 PM, Stanislav Laznicka wrote:
On 05/18/2016 01:15 PM, Stanislav Laznicka wrote:
On 05/18/2016 01:00 PM, Petr Spacek wrote:
On 18.5.2016 12:52, Jan Cholasta wrote:
On 18.5.2016 12:43, Stanislav Laznicka wrote:
On 05/18/2016 12:38 PM, Jan Cholasta wrote:
On 18.5.2016
On 18.05.2016 13:47, Stanislav Laznicka wrote:
On 05/18/2016 01:15 PM, Stanislav Laznicka wrote:
On 05/18/2016 01:00 PM, Petr Spacek wrote:
On 18.5.2016 12:52, Jan Cholasta wrote:
On 18.5.2016 12:43, Stanislav Laznicka wrote:
On 05/18/2016 12:38 PM, Jan Cholasta wrote:
On 18.5.2016 12:23,
On 05/18/2016 01:15 PM, Stanislav Laznicka wrote:
On 05/18/2016 01:00 PM, Petr Spacek wrote:
On 18.5.2016 12:52, Jan Cholasta wrote:
On 18.5.2016 12:43, Stanislav Laznicka wrote:
On 05/18/2016 12:38 PM, Jan Cholasta wrote:
On 18.5.2016 12:23, Petr Spacek wrote:
On 18.5.2016 08:25, Stanislav
On 18.5.2016 13:00, Petr Spacek wrote:
On 18.5.2016 12:52, Jan Cholasta wrote:
On 18.5.2016 12:43, Stanislav Laznicka wrote:
On 05/18/2016 12:38 PM, Jan Cholasta wrote:
On 18.5.2016 12:23, Petr Spacek wrote:
On 18.5.2016 08:25, Stanislav Laznicka wrote:
On 05/17/2016 12:40 PM, Petr Spacek
On 05/18/2016 01:00 PM, Petr Spacek wrote:
On 18.5.2016 12:52, Jan Cholasta wrote:
On 18.5.2016 12:43, Stanislav Laznicka wrote:
On 05/18/2016 12:38 PM, Jan Cholasta wrote:
On 18.5.2016 12:23, Petr Spacek wrote:
On 18.5.2016 08:25, Stanislav Laznicka wrote:
On 05/17/2016 12:40 PM, Petr
On 18.5.2016 12:52, Jan Cholasta wrote:
> On 18.5.2016 12:43, Stanislav Laznicka wrote:
>> On 05/18/2016 12:38 PM, Jan Cholasta wrote:
>>> On 18.5.2016 12:23, Petr Spacek wrote:
On 18.5.2016 08:25, Stanislav Laznicka wrote:
> On 05/17/2016 12:40 PM, Petr Spacek wrote:
>> On 13.5.2016
On 18.5.2016 12:43, Stanislav Laznicka wrote:
On 05/18/2016 12:38 PM, Jan Cholasta wrote:
On 18.5.2016 12:23, Petr Spacek wrote:
On 18.5.2016 08:25, Stanislav Laznicka wrote:
On 05/17/2016 12:40 PM, Petr Spacek wrote:
On 13.5.2016 13:50, Stanislav Laznicka wrote:
Hello list,
We had a
On 05/18/2016 12:38 PM, Jan Cholasta wrote:
On 18.5.2016 12:23, Petr Spacek wrote:
On 18.5.2016 08:25, Stanislav Laznicka wrote:
On 05/17/2016 12:40 PM, Petr Spacek wrote:
On 13.5.2016 13:50, Stanislav Laznicka wrote:
Hello list,
We had a discussion today over integrating the Time Rules
On 18.5.2016 12:23, Petr Spacek wrote:
On 18.5.2016 08:25, Stanislav Laznicka wrote:
On 05/17/2016 12:40 PM, Petr Spacek wrote:
On 13.5.2016 13:50, Stanislav Laznicka wrote:
Hello list,
We had a discussion today over integrating the Time Rules into the CLI and
WebUI and a problem came up
On 18.5.2016 08:25, Stanislav Laznicka wrote:
> On 05/17/2016 12:40 PM, Petr Spacek wrote:
>> On 13.5.2016 13:50, Stanislav Laznicka wrote:
>>> Hello list,
>>>
>>> We had a discussion today over integrating the Time Rules into the CLI and
>>> WebUI and a problem came up with with the current
On 05/17/2016 12:40 PM, Petr Spacek wrote:
On 13.5.2016 13:50, Stanislav Laznicka wrote:
Hello list,
We had a discussion today over integrating the Time Rules into the CLI and
WebUI and a problem came up with with the current solution. It seems that
while having templating handled by
On 13.5.2016 13:50, Stanislav Laznicka wrote:
> Hello list,
>
> We had a discussion today over integrating the Time Rules into the CLI and
> WebUI and a problem came up with with the current solution. It seems that
> while having templating handled by CoSTemplates might be nice in terms of easy
>
20 matches
Mail list logo
