On 06/13/2012 11:40 PM, Rob Crittenden wrote:
Petr Viktorin wrote:
On 06/12/2012 02:38 PM, Simo Sorce wrote:
On Tue, 2012-06-12 at 13:12 +0200, Petr Viktorin wrote:
This will make older clients usable if new output items get added to
commands.
Since there might be important information in
On Thu, 2012-06-14 at 10:51 +0200, Petr Viktorin wrote:
On 06/13/2012 11:40 PM, Rob Crittenden wrote:
[snip]
1. We could detect and supress unexpected output by default and include
a note at the end, something like:
Unexpected output suppressed, use --all to show.
That would work with
Petr Viktorin wrote:
On 06/12/2012 02:38 PM, Simo Sorce wrote:
On Tue, 2012-06-12 at 13:12 +0200, Petr Viktorin wrote:
This will make older clients usable if new output items get added to
commands.
Since there might be important information in the extra output, it's not
ignored as the ticket
On Tue, 2012-06-12 at 13:12 +0200, Petr Viktorin wrote:
This will make older clients usable if new output items get added to
commands.
Since there might be important information in the extra output, it's not
ignored as the ticket asks. Instead it's printed, but not formatted
nicely as
On 06/12/2012 02:38 PM, Simo Sorce wrote:
On Tue, 2012-06-12 at 13:12 +0200, Petr Viktorin wrote:
This will make older clients usable if new output items get added to
commands.
Since there might be important information in the extra output, it's not
ignored as the ticket asks. Instead it's