On 09/29/2015 01:57 PM, Tomas Babej wrote:
>
> On 09/25/2015 06:38 PM, Nathaniel McCallum wrote:
>> On Fri, 2015-09-25 at 12:18 -0400, Nathaniel McCallum wrote:
>>> Temporarily storing the offset time in an unsigned integer causes the
>>> value of the offset to underflow when a (valid) negative
On 09/29/2015 03:10 PM, Tomas Babej wrote:
>
>
> On 09/29/2015 01:57 PM, Tomas Babej wrote:
>>
>> On 09/25/2015 06:38 PM, Nathaniel McCallum wrote:
>>> On Fri, 2015-09-25 at 12:18 -0400, Nathaniel McCallum wrote:
Temporarily storing the offset time in an unsigned integer causes the
On 09/25/2015 06:38 PM, Nathaniel McCallum wrote:
> On Fri, 2015-09-25 at 12:18 -0400, Nathaniel McCallum wrote:
>> Temporarily storing the offset time in an unsigned integer causes the
>> value of the offset to underflow when a (valid) negative offset value
>> is generated. Using a signed
On Fri, 2015-09-25 at 12:18 -0400, Nathaniel McCallum wrote:
> Temporarily storing the offset time in an unsigned integer causes the
> value of the offset to underflow when a (valid) negative offset value
> is generated. Using a signed variable avoids this problem.
This new version makes the
