On Fri, 28 Jan 2011 17:10:53 +0100
Jakub Hrozek wrote:
> Apparently the fix was not enough, I got fooled by one callback in the
> framework and it worked only by accident. Thanks for testing, Simo.
>
> New patch attached.
Ack pushed to master,
Simo.
--
Simo Sorce * Red Hat, Inc * New York
_
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 01/27/2011 01:31 PM, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
> On 01/26/2011 09:50 PM, Simo Sorce wrote:
>> On Mon, 2011-01-24 at 15:51 +0100, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
>>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>>> Hash: SHA1
>>>
>>> On 01/21/2011 05:54 PM, Rob Crittenden wrote
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 01/26/2011 09:50 PM, Simo Sorce wrote:
> On Mon, 2011-01-24 at 15:51 +0100, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>> Hash: SHA1
>>
>> On 01/21/2011 05:54 PM, Rob Crittenden wrote:
>>> Jakub Hrozek wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNE
On Mon, 2011-01-24 at 15:51 +0100, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 01/21/2011 05:54 PM, Rob Crittenden wrote:
> > Jakub Hrozek wrote:
> >> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> >> Hash: SHA1
> >>
> >> On 01/20/2011 11:53 PM, Simo Sorce wrote:
> >>> On Th
On 01/24/2011 09:51 AM, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
Sorry, I don't know enough about the WebUI to give an authoritative
answer. I'll try to summarize the changes I did, if it doesn't answer
your question, please catch me on IRC:-)
The only change to the API is a new option "del_all" that specifies that
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 01/21/2011 05:54 PM, Rob Crittenden wrote:
> Jakub Hrozek wrote:
>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>> Hash: SHA1
>>
>> On 01/20/2011 11:53 PM, Simo Sorce wrote:
>>> On Thu, 20 Jan 2011 17:27:37 -0500
>>> Dmitri Pal wrote:
>>>
Michael Gregg
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 01/22/2011 02:28 AM, Adam Young wrote:
> Does any of this imply that we shopuld change the WebUI handling of Zone
> or Record deletes?
Sorry, I don't know enough about the WebUI to give an authoritative
answer. I'll try to summarize the changes I d
On 01/21/2011 11:54 AM, Rob Crittenden wrote:
Jakub Hrozek wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 01/20/2011 11:53 PM, Simo Sorce wrote:
On Thu, 20 Jan 2011 17:27:37 -0500
Dmitri Pal wrote:
Michael Gregg wrote:
Jakub Hrozek wrote:
Hi,
as discussed in https://bugzilla.redh
Jakub Hrozek wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 01/20/2011 11:53 PM, Simo Sorce wrote:
On Thu, 20 Jan 2011 17:27:37 -0500
Dmitri Pal wrote:
Michael Gregg wrote:
Jakub Hrozek wrote:
Hi,
as discussed in https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=671019
to delete a DNS R
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 01/20/2011 11:53 PM, Simo Sorce wrote:
> On Thu, 20 Jan 2011 17:27:37 -0500
> Dmitri Pal wrote:
>
>> Michael Gregg wrote:
>>> Jakub Hrozek wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> as discussed in https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=671019
>>> to delete a DN
On Thu, 20 Jan 2011 17:27:37 -0500
Dmitri Pal wrote:
> Michael Gregg wrote:
> > Jakub Hrozek wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > as discussed in https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=671019
> > to delete a DNS RR one has to remove its record types one by one.
> >
> > This patch modifies the behaviour so
Michael Gregg wrote:
> Jakub Hrozek wrote:
> Hi,
>
> as discussed in https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=671019 to
> delete a DNS RR one has to remove its record types one by one.
>
> This patch modifies the behaviour so that if the user runs dnsrecord-del
> with no other parameters, the
Jakub Hrozek wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
as discussed in https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=671019 to
delete a DNS RR one has to remove its record types one by one.
This patch modifies the behaviour so that if the user runs dnsrecord-del
with no other pa
13 matches
Mail list logo