Re: [Freeipa-devel] [PATCH] 1051 Fix CS replica management

2012-10-10 Thread Jan Cholasta
On 9.10.2012 21:31, Rob Crittenden wrote: Martin Kosek wrote: On 10/08/2012 05:12 PM, Jan Cholasta wrote: Hi, On 20.9.2012 19:38, Rob Crittenden wrote: Jan Cholasta wrote: Hi, Dne 31.8.2012 19:43, Rob Crittenden napsal(a): The naming in CS replication agreements is different from IPA

Re: [Freeipa-devel] [PATCH] 1051 Fix CS replica management

2012-10-10 Thread Rob Crittenden
Jan Cholasta wrote: On 9.10.2012 21:31, Rob Crittenden wrote: Martin Kosek wrote: On 10/08/2012 05:12 PM, Jan Cholasta wrote: Hi, On 20.9.2012 19:38, Rob Crittenden wrote: Jan Cholasta wrote: Hi, Dne 31.8.2012 19:43, Rob Crittenden napsal(a): The naming in CS replication agreements is

Re: [Freeipa-devel] [PATCH] 1051 Fix CS replica management

2012-10-09 Thread Martin Kosek
On 10/08/2012 05:12 PM, Jan Cholasta wrote: Hi, On 20.9.2012 19:38, Rob Crittenden wrote: Jan Cholasta wrote: Hi, Dne 31.8.2012 19:43, Rob Crittenden napsal(a): The naming in CS replication agreements is different from IPA agreements, we have to live with what the create. The master side

Re: [Freeipa-devel] [PATCH] 1051 Fix CS replica management

2012-10-09 Thread Rob Crittenden
Martin Kosek wrote: On 10/08/2012 05:12 PM, Jan Cholasta wrote: Hi, On 20.9.2012 19:38, Rob Crittenden wrote: Jan Cholasta wrote: Hi, Dne 31.8.2012 19:43, Rob Crittenden napsal(a): The naming in CS replication agreements is different from IPA agreements, we have to live with what the

Re: [Freeipa-devel] [PATCH] 1051 Fix CS replica management

2012-10-08 Thread Jan Cholasta
Hi, On 20.9.2012 19:38, Rob Crittenden wrote: Jan Cholasta wrote: Hi, Dne 31.8.2012 19:43, Rob Crittenden napsal(a): The naming in CS replication agreements is different from IPA agreements, we have to live with what the create. The master side should be on the local side, replica1, not the

Re: [Freeipa-devel] [PATCH] 1051 Fix CS replica management

2012-09-20 Thread Jan Cholasta
Hi, Dne 31.8.2012 19:43, Rob Crittenden napsal(a): The naming in CS replication agreements is different from IPA agreements, we have to live with what the create. The master side should be on the local side, replica1, not the remote. This required reversing a few master variables. Pass in the

Re: [Freeipa-devel] [PATCH] 1051 Fix CS replica management

2012-09-20 Thread Rob Crittenden
Jan Cholasta wrote: Hi, Dne 31.8.2012 19:43, Rob Crittenden napsal(a): The naming in CS replication agreements is different from IPA agreements, we have to live with what the create. The master side should be on the local side, replica1, not the remote. This required reversing a few master