On 9.10.2012 21:31, Rob Crittenden wrote:
Martin Kosek wrote:
On 10/08/2012 05:12 PM, Jan Cholasta wrote:
Hi,
On 20.9.2012 19:38, Rob Crittenden wrote:
Jan Cholasta wrote:
Hi,
Dne 31.8.2012 19:43, Rob Crittenden napsal(a):
The naming in CS replication agreements is different from IPA
Jan Cholasta wrote:
On 9.10.2012 21:31, Rob Crittenden wrote:
Martin Kosek wrote:
On 10/08/2012 05:12 PM, Jan Cholasta wrote:
Hi,
On 20.9.2012 19:38, Rob Crittenden wrote:
Jan Cholasta wrote:
Hi,
Dne 31.8.2012 19:43, Rob Crittenden napsal(a):
The naming in CS replication agreements is
On 10/08/2012 05:12 PM, Jan Cholasta wrote:
Hi,
On 20.9.2012 19:38, Rob Crittenden wrote:
Jan Cholasta wrote:
Hi,
Dne 31.8.2012 19:43, Rob Crittenden napsal(a):
The naming in CS replication agreements is different from IPA
agreements, we have to live with what the create. The master side
Martin Kosek wrote:
On 10/08/2012 05:12 PM, Jan Cholasta wrote:
Hi,
On 20.9.2012 19:38, Rob Crittenden wrote:
Jan Cholasta wrote:
Hi,
Dne 31.8.2012 19:43, Rob Crittenden napsal(a):
The naming in CS replication agreements is different from IPA
agreements, we have to live with what the
Hi,
On 20.9.2012 19:38, Rob Crittenden wrote:
Jan Cholasta wrote:
Hi,
Dne 31.8.2012 19:43, Rob Crittenden napsal(a):
The naming in CS replication agreements is different from IPA
agreements, we have to live with what the create. The master side should
be on the local side, replica1, not the
Hi,
Dne 31.8.2012 19:43, Rob Crittenden napsal(a):
The naming in CS replication agreements is different from IPA
agreements, we have to live with what the create. The master side should
be on the local side, replica1, not the remote. This required reversing
a few master variables.
Pass in the
Jan Cholasta wrote:
Hi,
Dne 31.8.2012 19:43, Rob Crittenden napsal(a):
The naming in CS replication agreements is different from IPA
agreements, we have to live with what the create. The master side should
be on the local side, replica1, not the remote. This required reversing
a few master