On Thu, 9 Dec 2010 14:19:43 -0500 Nalin Dahyabhai <na...@redhat.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 06, 2010 at 11:43:36AM -0500, Rob Crittenden wrote: > > What if we do both? Use the one provided by the KDC if it exists > > otherwise fall back to our own? > > Then you're basically depending on me getting the generated LDIF right > every time. I haven't previously done much validation of the result, > and it turns out that I missed a couple of syntax problems during the > initial import for Fedora's branch for 1.9. > > If we can spot any problems in that LDIF quickly enough when the krb5 > package gets updated, then we'll probably be fine, otherwise I'd be > worried about unintentionally breaking IPA. > > Up to you, I guess. This patch has been dropped. Simo. -- Simo Sorce * Red Hat, Inc * New York _______________________________________________ Freeipa-devel mailing list Freeipa-devel@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/freeipa-devel
