Re: [Freeipa-devel] [PATCH] 850 use pthrea read/write locks instead of NSPR RW locks

2011-08-24 Thread Martin Kosek
On Wed, 2011-08-24 at 07:41 -0400, Rob Crittenden wrote: > Martin Kosek wrote: > > On Mon, 2011-08-22 at 11:21 -0400, Rob Crittenden wrote: > >> NSPR PR_RWLocks are not re-entrant, use pthread read-write locks instead. > >> > >> rob > > > > Reference ticket in the commit message is wrong - I think

Re: [Freeipa-devel] [PATCH] 850 use pthrea read/write locks instead of NSPR RW locks

2011-08-24 Thread Rob Crittenden
Martin Kosek wrote: On Mon, 2011-08-22 at 11:21 -0400, Rob Crittenden wrote: NSPR PR_RWLocks are not re-entrant, use pthread read-write locks instead. rob Reference ticket in the commit message is wrong - I think you wanted to reference ticket 1635. This all looks good. But I was thinking -

Re: [Freeipa-devel] [PATCH] 850 use pthrea read/write locks instead of NSPR RW locks

2011-08-24 Thread Alexander Bokovoy
On 24.08.2011 13:15, Martin Kosek wrote: > On Mon, 2011-08-22 at 11:21 -0400, Rob Crittenden wrote: >> NSPR PR_RWLocks are not re-entrant, use pthread read-write locks instead. >> >> rob > > Reference ticket in the commit message is wrong - I think you wanted to > reference ticket 1635. > > This

Re: [Freeipa-devel] [PATCH] 850 use pthrea read/write locks instead of NSPR RW locks

2011-08-24 Thread Martin Kosek
On Mon, 2011-08-22 at 11:21 -0400, Rob Crittenden wrote: > NSPR PR_RWLocks are not re-entrant, use pthread read-write locks instead. > > rob Reference ticket in the commit message is wrong - I think you wanted to reference ticket 1635. This all looks good. But I was thinking - why don't we use t