On Wed, 2011-08-24 at 07:41 -0400, Rob Crittenden wrote:
> Martin Kosek wrote:
> > On Mon, 2011-08-22 at 11:21 -0400, Rob Crittenden wrote:
> >> NSPR PR_RWLocks are not re-entrant, use pthread read-write locks instead.
> >>
> >> rob
> >
> > Reference ticket in the commit message is wrong - I think
Martin Kosek wrote:
On Mon, 2011-08-22 at 11:21 -0400, Rob Crittenden wrote:
NSPR PR_RWLocks are not re-entrant, use pthread read-write locks instead.
rob
Reference ticket in the commit message is wrong - I think you wanted to
reference ticket 1635.
This all looks good. But I was thinking -
On 24.08.2011 13:15, Martin Kosek wrote:
> On Mon, 2011-08-22 at 11:21 -0400, Rob Crittenden wrote:
>> NSPR PR_RWLocks are not re-entrant, use pthread read-write locks instead.
>>
>> rob
>
> Reference ticket in the commit message is wrong - I think you wanted to
> reference ticket 1635.
>
> This
On Mon, 2011-08-22 at 11:21 -0400, Rob Crittenden wrote:
> NSPR PR_RWLocks are not re-entrant, use pthread read-write locks instead.
>
> rob
Reference ticket in the commit message is wrong - I think you wanted to
reference ticket 1635.
This all looks good. But I was thinking - why don't we use t