On Mon, 2011-10-03 at 16:44 -0400, Rob Crittenden wrote:
Martin Kosek wrote:
On Mon, 2011-09-26 at 22:24 -0400, Rob Crittenden wrote:
We can't assume that there will be only one naming context. Look at each
one until we find an IPA one.
Add logging so you can know that a migration
Martin Kosek wrote:
On Mon, 2011-10-03 at 16:44 -0400, Rob Crittenden wrote:
Martin Kosek wrote:
On Mon, 2011-09-26 at 22:24 -0400, Rob Crittenden wrote:
We can't assume that there will be only one naming context. Look at each
one until we find an IPA one.
Add logging so you can know that a
On Tue, 2011-10-04 at 08:53 -0400, Rob Crittenden wrote:
Martin Kosek wrote:
On Mon, 2011-10-03 at 16:44 -0400, Rob Crittenden wrote:
Martin Kosek wrote:
On Mon, 2011-09-26 at 22:24 -0400, Rob Crittenden wrote:
We can't assume that there will be only one naming context. Look at each
one
Martin Kosek wrote:
On Tue, 2011-10-04 at 08:53 -0400, Rob Crittenden wrote:
Martin Kosek wrote:
On Mon, 2011-10-03 at 16:44 -0400, Rob Crittenden wrote:
Martin Kosek wrote:
On Mon, 2011-09-26 at 22:24 -0400, Rob Crittenden wrote:
We can't assume that there will be only one naming context.
On Tue, 2011-10-04 at 09:26 -0400, Rob Crittenden wrote:
Martin Kosek wrote:
On Tue, 2011-10-04 at 08:53 -0400, Rob Crittenden wrote:
Martin Kosek wrote:
On Mon, 2011-10-03 at 16:44 -0400, Rob Crittenden wrote:
Martin Kosek wrote:
On Mon, 2011-09-26 at 22:24 -0400, Rob Crittenden wrote:
On Mon, 2011-09-26 at 22:24 -0400, Rob Crittenden wrote:
We can't assume that there will be only one naming context. Look at each
one until we find an IPA one.
Add logging so you can know that a migration attempt fails and why.
rob
Looks good, its just difficult to set up a proper
