On 13.01.2016 16:13, Martin Basti wrote:
On 13.01.2016 16:03, Simo Sorce wrote:
On Wed, 2016-01-13 at 15:49 +0100, Martin Basti wrote:
On 13.01.2016 15:31, Martin Babinsky wrote:
On 01/13/2016 03:30 PM, Simo Sorce wrote:
On Wed, 2016-01-13 at 14:02 +0100, Martin Babinsky wrote:
On
On 01/05/2016 11:19 PM, Simo Sorce wrote:
On Tue, 2016-01-05 at 16:15 -0500, Simo Sorce wrote:
The LDAP context was not checked on the first api call and a context may
be null on some error conditions (LDAP server unreachable).
Always check that we have a valid context before calling the ldap
On 01/13/2016 03:30 PM, Simo Sorce wrote:
On Wed, 2016-01-13 at 14:02 +0100, Martin Babinsky wrote:
On 01/05/2016 11:19 PM, Simo Sorce wrote:
On Tue, 2016-01-05 at 16:15 -0500, Simo Sorce wrote:
The LDAP context was not checked on the first api call and a context may
be null on some error
On 13.01.2016 15:31, Martin Babinsky wrote:
On 01/13/2016 03:30 PM, Simo Sorce wrote:
On Wed, 2016-01-13 at 14:02 +0100, Martin Babinsky wrote:
On 01/05/2016 11:19 PM, Simo Sorce wrote:
On Tue, 2016-01-05 at 16:15 -0500, Simo Sorce wrote:
The LDAP context was not checked on the first api
On Wed, 2016-01-13 at 15:49 +0100, Martin Basti wrote:
>
> On 13.01.2016 15:31, Martin Babinsky wrote:
> > On 01/13/2016 03:30 PM, Simo Sorce wrote:
> >> On Wed, 2016-01-13 at 14:02 +0100, Martin Babinsky wrote:
> >>> On 01/05/2016 11:19 PM, Simo Sorce wrote:
> On Tue, 2016-01-05 at 16:15
On Wed, 2016-01-13 at 14:02 +0100, Martin Babinsky wrote:
> On 01/05/2016 11:19 PM, Simo Sorce wrote:
> > On Tue, 2016-01-05 at 16:15 -0500, Simo Sorce wrote:
> >> The LDAP context was not checked on the first api call and a context may
> >> be null on some error conditions (LDAP server
On Tue, 2016-01-05 at 16:15 -0500, Simo Sorce wrote:
> The LDAP context was not checked on the first api call and a context may
> be null on some error conditions (LDAP server unreachable).
>
> Always check that we have a valid context before calling the ldap API.
>
> Builds abut it is untested.