Re: [Freeipa-devel] [PATCH 69] Use indexed format specifiers in i18n strings

2012-04-11 Thread Rob Crittenden
John Dennis wrote: On 04/04/2012 09:01 AM, Petr Viktorin wrote: On 04/02/2012 03:15 PM, Rob Crittenden wrote: John Dennis wrote: Translators need to reorder messages to suit the needs of the target language. The conventional positional format specifiers (e.g. %s %d) do not permit reordering be

Re: [Freeipa-devel] [PATCH 69] Use indexed format specifiers in i18n strings

2012-04-05 Thread John Dennis
On 04/04/2012 09:01 AM, Petr Viktorin wrote: On 04/02/2012 03:15 PM, Rob Crittenden wrote: John Dennis wrote: Translators need to reorder messages to suit the needs of the target language. The conventional positional format specifiers (e.g. %s %d) do not permit reordering because their order is

Re: [Freeipa-devel] [PATCH 69] Use indexed format specifiers in i18n strings

2012-04-04 Thread Petr Viktorin
On 04/02/2012 03:15 PM, Rob Crittenden wrote: John Dennis wrote: Translators need to reorder messages to suit the needs of the target language. The conventional positional format specifiers (e.g. %s %d) do not permit reordering because their order is tied to the ordering of the arguments to the

Re: [Freeipa-devel] [PATCH 69] Use indexed format specifiers in i18n strings

2012-04-02 Thread Rob Crittenden
John Dennis wrote: Translators need to reorder messages to suit the needs of the target language. The conventional positional format specifiers (e.g. %s %d) do not permit reordering because their order is tied to the ordering of the arguments to the printf function. The fix is to use indexed form