On 05/28/2014 10:50 PM, Dmitri Pal wrote:
On 05/28/2014 01:18 PM, Rob Crittenden wrote:
Simo Sorce wrote:
On Wed, 2014-05-28 at 15:56 +0200, Martin Kosek wrote:
On 05/28/2014 02:48 PM, Simo Sorce wrote:
On Wed, 2014-05-28 at 09:38 +0200, thierry bordaz wrote:
On 05/28/2014 08:22 AM, Martin K
On 05/28/2014 01:18 PM, Rob Crittenden wrote:
Simo Sorce wrote:
On Wed, 2014-05-28 at 15:56 +0200, Martin Kosek wrote:
On 05/28/2014 02:48 PM, Simo Sorce wrote:
On Wed, 2014-05-28 at 09:38 +0200, thierry bordaz wrote:
On 05/28/2014 08:22 AM, Martin Kosek wrote:
On 05/27/2014 08:18 PM, Simo S
On 05/27/2014 12:39 PM, thierry bordaz wrote:
On 05/27/2014 06:06 PM, Simo Sorce wrote:
On Tue, 2014-05-27 at 17:55 +0200, thierry bordaz wrote:
On 05/27/2014 04:35 PM, Martin Kosek wrote:
On 05/27/2014 04:27 PM, Simo Sorce wrote:
On Tue, 2014-05-27 at 15:21 +0200, Martin Kosek wrote:
This t
Simo Sorce wrote:
> On Wed, 2014-05-28 at 15:56 +0200, Martin Kosek wrote:
>> On 05/28/2014 02:48 PM, Simo Sorce wrote:
>>> On Wed, 2014-05-28 at 09:38 +0200, thierry bordaz wrote:
On 05/28/2014 08:22 AM, Martin Kosek wrote:
> On 05/27/2014 08:18 PM, Simo Sorce wrote:
>> On Tue, 2014-0
On Wed, 2014-05-28 at 15:56 +0200, Martin Kosek wrote:
> On 05/28/2014 02:48 PM, Simo Sorce wrote:
> > On Wed, 2014-05-28 at 09:38 +0200, thierry bordaz wrote:
> >> On 05/28/2014 08:22 AM, Martin Kosek wrote:
> >>> On 05/27/2014 08:18 PM, Simo Sorce wrote:
> On Tue, 2014-05-27 at 21:14 +0300,
On 28.5.2014 15:56, Martin Kosek wrote:
On 05/28/2014 02:48 PM, Simo Sorce wrote:
On Wed, 2014-05-28 at 09:38 +0200, thierry bordaz wrote:
On 05/28/2014 08:22 AM, Martin Kosek wrote:
On 05/27/2014 08:18 PM, Simo Sorce wrote:
On Tue, 2014-05-27 at 21:14 +0300, Alexander Bokovoy wrote:
On Tue,
On 05/28/2014 03:06 PM, thierry bordaz wrote:
> On 05/28/2014 02:55 PM, Rob Crittenden wrote:
>> Simo Sorce wrote:
>>> On Wed, 2014-05-28 at 09:38 +0200, thierry bordaz wrote:
On 05/28/2014 08:22 AM, Martin Kosek wrote:
> On 05/27/2014 08:18 PM, Simo Sorce wrote:
>> On Tue, 2014-05-27
On 05/28/2014 02:48 PM, Simo Sorce wrote:
> On Wed, 2014-05-28 at 09:38 +0200, thierry bordaz wrote:
>> On 05/28/2014 08:22 AM, Martin Kosek wrote:
>>> On 05/27/2014 08:18 PM, Simo Sorce wrote:
On Tue, 2014-05-27 at 21:14 +0300, Alexander Bokovoy wrote:
> On Tue, 27 May 2014, Simo Sorce wr
On 05/28/2014 02:55 PM, Rob Crittenden wrote:
Simo Sorce wrote:
On Wed, 2014-05-28 at 09:38 +0200, thierry bordaz wrote:
On 05/28/2014 08:22 AM, Martin Kosek wrote:
On 05/27/2014 08:18 PM, Simo Sorce wrote:
On Tue, 2014-05-27 at 21:14 +0300, Alexander Bokovoy wrote:
On Tue, 27 May 2014, Simo
Simo Sorce wrote:
> On Wed, 2014-05-28 at 09:38 +0200, thierry bordaz wrote:
>> On 05/28/2014 08:22 AM, Martin Kosek wrote:
>>> On 05/27/2014 08:18 PM, Simo Sorce wrote:
On Tue, 2014-05-27 at 21:14 +0300, Alexander Bokovoy wrote:
> On Tue, 27 May 2014, Simo Sorce wrote:
>> On Tue, 2014
On Wed, 2014-05-28 at 09:38 +0200, thierry bordaz wrote:
> On 05/28/2014 08:22 AM, Martin Kosek wrote:
> > On 05/27/2014 08:18 PM, Simo Sorce wrote:
> >> On Tue, 2014-05-27 at 21:14 +0300, Alexander Bokovoy wrote:
> >>> On Tue, 27 May 2014, Simo Sorce wrote:
> On Tue, 2014-05-27 at 19:59 +0200
On 05/28/2014 08:22 AM, Martin Kosek wrote:
On 05/27/2014 08:18 PM, Simo Sorce wrote:
On Tue, 2014-05-27 at 21:14 +0300, Alexander Bokovoy wrote:
On Tue, 27 May 2014, Simo Sorce wrote:
On Tue, 2014-05-27 at 19:59 +0200, thierry bordaz wrote:
On 05/27/2014 06:56 PM, Simo Sorce wrote:
On Tue,
On 05/27/2014 08:18 PM, Simo Sorce wrote:
> On Tue, 2014-05-27 at 21:14 +0300, Alexander Bokovoy wrote:
>> On Tue, 27 May 2014, Simo Sorce wrote:
>>> On Tue, 2014-05-27 at 19:59 +0200, thierry bordaz wrote:
On 05/27/2014 06:56 PM, Simo Sorce wrote:
> On Tue, 2014-05-27 at 18:39 +0200, thie
On Tue, 27 May 2014, Simo Sorce wrote:
On Tue, 2014-05-27 at 19:59 +0200, thierry bordaz wrote:
On 05/27/2014 06:56 PM, Simo Sorce wrote:
> On Tue, 2014-05-27 at 18:39 +0200, thierry bordaz wrote:
>> On 05/27/2014 06:06 PM, Simo Sorce wrote:
>>> We just need to care about the 'uid' attribute in
On Tue, 2014-05-27 at 21:14 +0300, Alexander Bokovoy wrote:
> On Tue, 27 May 2014, Simo Sorce wrote:
> >On Tue, 2014-05-27 at 19:59 +0200, thierry bordaz wrote:
> >> On 05/27/2014 06:56 PM, Simo Sorce wrote:
> >> > On Tue, 2014-05-27 at 18:39 +0200, thierry bordaz wrote:
> >> >> On 05/27/2014 06:06
On Tue, 2014-05-27 at 19:59 +0200, thierry bordaz wrote:
> On 05/27/2014 06:56 PM, Simo Sorce wrote:
> > On Tue, 2014-05-27 at 18:39 +0200, thierry bordaz wrote:
> >> On 05/27/2014 06:06 PM, Simo Sorce wrote:
> >>> We just need to care about the 'uid' attribute in the staged entry, and
> >>> pick t
On 05/27/2014 06:56 PM, Simo Sorce wrote:
On Tue, 2014-05-27 at 18:39 +0200, thierry bordaz wrote:
On 05/27/2014 06:06 PM, Simo Sorce wrote:
We just need to care about the 'uid' attribute in the staged entry, and
pick that to generate the RDN of the user in the active tree. If there
are conflic
On Tue, 2014-05-27 at 18:39 +0200, thierry bordaz wrote:
> On 05/27/2014 06:06 PM, Simo Sorce wrote:
> > We just need to care about the 'uid' attribute in the staged entry, and
> > pick that to generate the RDN of the user in the active tree. If there
> > are conflicts the 'unstage' will fail clea
On 05/27/2014 06:06 PM, Simo Sorce wrote:
On Tue, 2014-05-27 at 17:55 +0200, thierry bordaz wrote:
On 05/27/2014 04:35 PM, Martin Kosek wrote:
On 05/27/2014 04:27 PM, Simo Sorce wrote:
On Tue, 2014-05-27 at 15:21 +0200, Martin Kosek wrote:
This topic was already discussed in the past, see fol
On Tue, 2014-05-27 at 17:55 +0200, thierry bordaz wrote:
> On 05/27/2014 04:35 PM, Martin Kosek wrote:
> > On 05/27/2014 04:27 PM, Simo Sorce wrote:
> >> On Tue, 2014-05-27 at 15:21 +0200, Martin Kosek wrote:
> >>> This topic was already discussed in the past, see following part of
> >>> the design
On 05/27/2014 04:35 PM, Martin Kosek wrote:
On 05/27/2014 04:27 PM, Simo Sorce wrote:
On Tue, 2014-05-27 at 15:21 +0200, Martin Kosek wrote:
This topic was already discussed in the past, see following part of
the design:
http://www.freeipa.org/page/V4/User_Life-Cycle_Management#Renaming_vs._Mo
On 05/27/2014 04:27 PM, Simo Sorce wrote:
> On Tue, 2014-05-27 at 15:21 +0200, Martin Kosek wrote:
>> This topic was already discussed in the past, see following part of
>> the design:
>>
>> http://www.freeipa.org/page/V4/User_Life-Cycle_Management#Renaming_vs._Moving_Users_in_LDAP
>>
>> One of the
On Tue, 2014-05-27 at 15:21 +0200, Martin Kosek wrote:
> This topic was already discussed in the past, see following part of
> the design:
>
> http://www.freeipa.org/page/V4/User_Life-Cycle_Management#Renaming_vs._Moving_Users_in_LDAP
>
> One of the biggest concern was that to allow operator unst
On 05/27/2014 03:08 PM, Simo Sorce wrote:
On Tue, 2014-05-27 at 14:40 +0200, thierry bordaz wrote:
On 05/27/2014 02:32 PM, Jan Cholasta wrote:
On 27.5.2014 14:22, Simo Sorce wrote:
On Tue, 2014-05-27 at 14:19 +0200, Martin Kosek wrote:
On 05/27/2014 02:16 PM, Simo Sorce wrote:
On Tue, 2014-0
On 05/27/2014 03:10 PM, Simo Sorce wrote:
On Tue, 2014-05-27 at 14:59 +0200, thierry bordaz wrote:
Now if an entry was not created by FreeIPA CLI ('ipa user-add
--stage') it could be impossible to update/unstage the entry with
FreeIPA CLI .
For example with those two entries. 'ipa user-mod TestU
On 05/27/2014 03:08 PM, Simo Sorce wrote:
> On Tue, 2014-05-27 at 14:40 +0200, thierry bordaz wrote:
>> On 05/27/2014 02:32 PM, Jan Cholasta wrote:
>>> On 27.5.2014 14:22, Simo Sorce wrote:
On Tue, 2014-05-27 at 14:19 +0200, Martin Kosek wrote:
> On 05/27/2014 02:16 PM, Simo Sorce wrote:
>
On Tue, 2014-05-27 at 14:59 +0200, thierry bordaz wrote:
> Now if an entry was not created by FreeIPA CLI ('ipa user-add
> --stage') it could be impossible to update/unstage the entry with
> FreeIPA CLI .
> For example with those two entries. 'ipa user-mod TestUser --stage' or
> 'ipa user-unstage T
On Tue, 2014-05-27 at 14:40 +0200, thierry bordaz wrote:
> On 05/27/2014 02:32 PM, Jan Cholasta wrote:
> > On 27.5.2014 14:22, Simo Sorce wrote:
> >> On Tue, 2014-05-27 at 14:19 +0200, Martin Kosek wrote:
> >>> On 05/27/2014 02:16 PM, Simo Sorce wrote:
> On Tue, 2014-05-27 at 13:01 +0200, Mart
On 05/27/2014 02:19 PM, Martin Kosek wrote:
On 05/27/2014 02:16 PM, Simo Sorce wrote:
On Tue, 2014-05-27 at 13:01 +0200, Martin Kosek wrote:
On 05/27/2014 11:53 AM, Jan Cholasta wrote:
On 27.5.2014 11:14, thierry bordaz wrote:
Hello,
Me again !!!
Thanks to all your inputs, the dis
On 05/27/2014 02:32 PM, Jan Cholasta wrote:
On 27.5.2014 14:22, Simo Sorce wrote:
On Tue, 2014-05-27 at 14:19 +0200, Martin Kosek wrote:
On 05/27/2014 02:16 PM, Simo Sorce wrote:
On Tue, 2014-05-27 at 13:01 +0200, Martin Kosek wrote:
On 05/27/2014 11:53 AM, Jan Cholasta wrote:
On 27.5.2014 1
On 27.5.2014 14:22, Simo Sorce wrote:
On Tue, 2014-05-27 at 14:19 +0200, Martin Kosek wrote:
On 05/27/2014 02:16 PM, Simo Sorce wrote:
On Tue, 2014-05-27 at 13:01 +0200, Martin Kosek wrote:
On 05/27/2014 11:53 AM, Jan Cholasta wrote:
On 27.5.2014 11:14, thierry bordaz wrote:
Hello,
Me
On Tue, 2014-05-27 at 14:19 +0200, Martin Kosek wrote:
> On 05/27/2014 02:16 PM, Simo Sorce wrote:
> > On Tue, 2014-05-27 at 13:01 +0200, Martin Kosek wrote:
> >> On 05/27/2014 11:53 AM, Jan Cholasta wrote:
> >>> On 27.5.2014 11:14, thierry bordaz wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Me again !!!
On 05/27/2014 02:16 PM, Simo Sorce wrote:
> On Tue, 2014-05-27 at 13:01 +0200, Martin Kosek wrote:
>> On 05/27/2014 11:53 AM, Jan Cholasta wrote:
>>> On 27.5.2014 11:14, thierry bordaz wrote:
Hello,
Me again !!!
Thanks to all your inputs, the discussion about User_l
On Tue, 2014-05-27 at 13:01 +0200, Martin Kosek wrote:
> On 05/27/2014 11:53 AM, Jan Cholasta wrote:
> > On 27.5.2014 11:14, thierry bordaz wrote:
> >> Hello,
> >>
> >> Me again !!!
> >>
> >> Thanks to all your inputs, the discussion about User_life_cycle
> >> clarified a lot workflow/c
On 05/27/2014 11:53 AM, Jan Cholasta wrote:
> On 27.5.2014 11:14, thierry bordaz wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> Me again !!!
>>
>> Thanks to all your inputs, the discussion about User_life_cycle
>> clarified a lot workflow/command verbs.
>>
>> Now I have a doubt about what would be an entry
On 27.5.2014 11:14, thierry bordaz wrote:
Hello,
Me again !!!
Thanks to all your inputs, the discussion about User_life_cycle
clarified a lot workflow/command verbs.
Now I have a doubt about what would be an entry in staging
(objectclass/attribute). Also I wonder if ipa CLI
36 matches
Mail list logo