el"
> Sent: Thursday, April 21, 2016 9:34:51 AM
> Subject: Re: [Freeipa-devel] V4/RFC 2818 review
>
> On Thu, Apr 21, 2016 at 10:22:33AM +0300, Alexander Bokovoy wrote:
> > On Thu, 21 Apr 2016, Fraser Tweedale wrote:
> > >On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 11:06:15AM -040
On Thu, Apr 21, 2016 at 10:22:33AM +0300, Alexander Bokovoy wrote:
> On Thu, 21 Apr 2016, Fraser Tweedale wrote:
> >On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 11:06:15AM -0400, Rob Crittenden wrote:
> >>Christian Heimes wrote:
> >>>Hi Fraser,
> >>>
> >>>and now to the review of your design doc for RFC 2818-compliant
On Thu, 21 Apr 2016, Fraser Tweedale wrote:
On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 11:06:15AM -0400, Rob Crittenden wrote:
Christian Heimes wrote:
>Hi Fraser,
>
>and now to the review of your design doc for RFC 2818-compliant subject
>alternative names in certs,
>http://www.freeipa.org/page/V4/RFC_2818_certifi
On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 04:14:01PM +0200, Christian Heimes wrote:
> Hi Fraser,
>
> and now to the review of your design doc for RFC 2818-compliant subject
> alternative names in certs,
> http://www.freeipa.org/page/V4/RFC_2818_certificate_compliance
>
>
> 1) RFC 2818 vs. RFC 6125
>
> First I li
On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 11:06:15AM -0400, Rob Crittenden wrote:
> Christian Heimes wrote:
> >Hi Fraser,
> >
> >and now to the review of your design doc for RFC 2818-compliant subject
> >alternative names in certs,
> >http://www.freeipa.org/page/V4/RFC_2818_certificate_compliance
> >
> >
> >1) RFC 2
Christian Heimes wrote:
Hi Fraser,
and now to the review of your design doc for RFC 2818-compliant subject
alternative names in certs,
http://www.freeipa.org/page/V4/RFC_2818_certificate_compliance
1) RFC 2818 vs. RFC 6125
First I like to address a more general topic. Your design mentions RFC
