Re: [Freeipa-devel] topology management question

2015-01-09 Thread Simo Sorce
On Fri, 09 Jan 2015 16:07:21 +0100 Ludwig Krispenz lkris...@redhat.com wrote: On 01/09/2015 03:50 PM, Simo Sorce wrote: On Fri, 09 Jan 2015 15:29:02 +0100 Ludwig Krispenz lkris...@redhat.com wrote: On 01/07/2015 05:35 PM, Simo Sorce wrote: On Wed, 07 Jan 2015 17:23:08 +0100 Ludwig

Re: [Freeipa-devel] topology management question

2015-01-09 Thread Ludwig Krispenz
On 01/09/2015 04:18 PM, Simo Sorce wrote: On Fri, 09 Jan 2015 16:07:21 +0100 Ludwig Krispenz lkris...@redhat.com wrote: On 01/09/2015 03:50 PM, Simo Sorce wrote: On Fri, 09 Jan 2015 15:29:02 +0100 Ludwig Krispenz lkris...@redhat.com wrote: On 01/07/2015 05:35 PM, Simo Sorce wrote: On Wed,

Re: [Freeipa-devel] topology management question

2015-01-09 Thread Ludwig Krispenz
On 01/07/2015 05:35 PM, Simo Sorce wrote: On Wed, 07 Jan 2015 17:23:08 +0100 Ludwig Krispenz lkris...@redhat.com wrote: On 01/07/2015 05:13 PM, Simo Sorce wrote: On Wed, 07 Jan 2015 17:11:53 +0100 Ludwig Krispenz lkris...@redhat.com wrote: Now, with some effort this can be resolved, eg if

Re: [Freeipa-devel] topology management question

2015-01-09 Thread Simo Sorce
On Fri, 09 Jan 2015 15:29:02 +0100 Ludwig Krispenz lkris...@redhat.com wrote: On 01/07/2015 05:35 PM, Simo Sorce wrote: On Wed, 07 Jan 2015 17:23:08 +0100 Ludwig Krispenz lkris...@redhat.com wrote: On 01/07/2015 05:13 PM, Simo Sorce wrote: On Wed, 07 Jan 2015 17:11:53 +0100 Ludwig

Re: [Freeipa-devel] topology management question

2015-01-09 Thread Ludwig Krispenz
On 01/09/2015 03:50 PM, Simo Sorce wrote: On Fri, 09 Jan 2015 15:29:02 +0100 Ludwig Krispenz lkris...@redhat.com wrote: On 01/07/2015 05:35 PM, Simo Sorce wrote: On Wed, 07 Jan 2015 17:23:08 +0100 Ludwig Krispenz lkris...@redhat.com wrote: On 01/07/2015 05:13 PM, Simo Sorce wrote: On Wed,

Re: [Freeipa-devel] topology management question

2015-01-07 Thread Ludwig Krispenz
Now, with some effort this can be resolved, eg if the server is removed, keep it internally as removed server and for segments connecting this server trigger removal of replication agreements or mark a the last segment, when tried to remove, as pending and once the server is removed also remove

Re: [Freeipa-devel] topology management question

2015-01-07 Thread Simo Sorce
On Wed, 07 Jan 2015 17:11:53 +0100 Ludwig Krispenz lkris...@redhat.com wrote: Now, with some effort this can be resolved, eg if the server is removed, keep it internally as removed server and for segments connecting this server trigger removal of replication agreements or mark a the

Re: [Freeipa-devel] topology management question

2015-01-07 Thread Simo Sorce
On Wed, 07 Jan 2015 17:23:08 +0100 Ludwig Krispenz lkris...@redhat.com wrote: On 01/07/2015 05:13 PM, Simo Sorce wrote: On Wed, 07 Jan 2015 17:11:53 +0100 Ludwig Krispenz lkris...@redhat.com wrote: Now, with some effort this can be resolved, eg if the server is removed, keep it

Re: [Freeipa-devel] topology management question

2015-01-07 Thread Ludwig Krispenz
On 01/07/2015 05:13 PM, Simo Sorce wrote: On Wed, 07 Jan 2015 17:11:53 +0100 Ludwig Krispenz lkris...@redhat.com wrote: Now, with some effort this can be resolved, eg if the server is removed, keep it internally as removed server and for segments connecting this server trigger removal of

Re: [Freeipa-devel] topology management question

2014-12-11 Thread Ludwig Krispenz
On 12/05/2014 04:50 PM, Simo Sorce wrote: On Thu, 04 Dec 2014 14:33:09 +0100 Ludwig Krispenz lkris...@redhat.com wrote: hi, I just have another (hopefully this will end soon) issue I want to get your input. (please read to teh end first) To recapture the conditions: - the topology plugin

Re: [Freeipa-devel] topology management question

2014-12-11 Thread Simo Sorce
On Thu, 11 Dec 2014 14:18:36 +0100 Ludwig Krispenz lkris...@redhat.com wrote: On 12/05/2014 04:50 PM, Simo Sorce wrote: On Thu, 04 Dec 2014 14:33:09 +0100 Ludwig Krispenz lkris...@redhat.com wrote: hi, I just have another (hopefully this will end soon) issue I want to get your

Re: [Freeipa-devel] topology management question

2014-12-11 Thread Petr Spacek
On 11.12.2014 15:20, Simo Sorce wrote: On Thu, 11 Dec 2014 14:18:36 +0100 Ludwig Krispenz lkris...@redhat.com wrote: On 12/05/2014 04:50 PM, Simo Sorce wrote: On Thu, 04 Dec 2014 14:33:09 +0100 Ludwig Krispenz lkris...@redhat.com wrote: hi, I just have another (hopefully this will end

Re: [Freeipa-devel] topology management question

2014-12-11 Thread Simo Sorce
On Thu, 11 Dec 2014 17:03:55 +0100 Petr Spacek pspa...@redhat.com wrote: On 11.12.2014 15:20, Simo Sorce wrote: On Thu, 11 Dec 2014 14:18:36 +0100 Ludwig Krispenz lkris...@redhat.com wrote: On 12/05/2014 04:50 PM, Simo Sorce wrote: On Thu, 04 Dec 2014 14:33:09 +0100 Ludwig

Re: [Freeipa-devel] topology management question

2014-12-09 Thread Rob Crittenden
Simo Sorce wrote: On Sun, 07 Dec 2014 10:25:06 -0500 Rob Crittenden rcrit...@redhat.com wrote: Simo Sorce wrote: On Thu, 04 Dec 2014 14:33:09 +0100 Ludwig Krispenz lkris...@redhat.com wrote: hi, I just have another (hopefully this will end soon) issue I want to get your input. (please

Re: [Freeipa-devel] topology management question

2014-12-09 Thread Simo Sorce
On Tue, 09 Dec 2014 09:21:43 -0500 Rob Crittenden rcrit...@redhat.com wrote: Simo Sorce wrote: On Sun, 07 Dec 2014 10:25:06 -0500 Rob Crittenden rcrit...@redhat.com wrote: Simo Sorce wrote: On Thu, 04 Dec 2014 14:33:09 +0100 Ludwig Krispenz lkris...@redhat.com wrote: hi, I

Re: [Freeipa-devel] topology management question

2014-12-07 Thread Rob Crittenden
Simo Sorce wrote: On Thu, 04 Dec 2014 14:33:09 +0100 Ludwig Krispenz lkris...@redhat.com wrote: hi, I just have another (hopefully this will end soon) issue I want to get your input. (please read to teh end first) To recapture the conditions: - the topology plugin manages the

Re: [Freeipa-devel] topology management question

2014-12-05 Thread Rob Crittenden
Ludwig Krispenz wrote: hi, I just have another (hopefully this will end soon) issue I want to get your input. (please read to teh end first) To recapture the conditions: - the topology plugin manages the connections between servers as segments in the shared tree - it is authoritative