[Freeipa-users] Re: dns of two out of three masters not up to date

2021-06-29 Thread Kees Bakker via FreeIPA-users
Throwing in more details. At startup we have this in the log Jun 29 14:32:36 linge.ghs.nl named-pkcs11[6945]: 10 master zones from LDAP instance 'ipa' loaded (10 zones defined, 0 inactive, 0 failed to load) Jun 29 14:32:36 linge.ghs.nl named-pkcs11[6945]: managed-keys-zone: Unable to fetch DNSK

[Freeipa-users] Re: dns of two out of three masters not up to date

2021-06-29 Thread Kees Bakker via FreeIPA-users
Three weeks ago I had to disable dnssec (due to problem with one of the forwarding domains). So I changed/added     dnssec-enable no;     dnssec-validation no; Could that have any influence? On 29-06-2021 11:03, Kees Bakker via FreeIPA-users wrote: Hi Flo, Now that I know all the plugins are

[Freeipa-users] Re: dns of two out of three masters not up to date

2021-06-29 Thread Kees Bakker via FreeIPA-users
Hi Flo, Now that I know all the plugins are present, I was suspecting nsslapd-changelogmaxage. But that was false hope. It is set to 2d (which is the default, I think). I definitely don't see the syncrepl_update output in /var/named/data/named.run WIth one exception, two days ago around 03:18

[Freeipa-users] Re: dns of two out of three masters not up to date

2021-06-29 Thread Florence Renaud via FreeIPA-users
Hi, as said on the other mail thread https://lists.fedorahosted.org/archives/list/freeipa-users@lists.fedorahosted.org/thread/GR2ZOFFNICWKLI3YBFYVTFZHUNNKDIQZ/, I suspect the search for plugins is executed with ldapsearch -Y GSSAPI ... and the ACIs are filtering part of the output. The command lda

[Freeipa-users] Re: dns of two out of three masters not up to date

2021-06-23 Thread Kees Bakker via FreeIPA-users
So far not much luck in finding what is wrong. No sign of sync_repl or syncrepl in the logs. What I don't understand is why the cn=plugins,cn=config LDAP of the three masters is so different. On the "old main" Centos7 master there are 388 entries. On the newer CentOS 8 Stream masters there are o

[Freeipa-users] Re: dns of two out of three masters not up to date

2021-06-21 Thread Rafael Jeffman via FreeIPA-users
Hello, On Mon, Jun 21, 2021 at 3:40 PM Kees Bakker via FreeIPA-users < freeipa-users@lists.fedorahosted.org> wrote: > > Hi, > > There is nothing in the daemon logs with "syncrepl" or "sync_repl". > > Should there be a syncrepl log for every update? Or only when there > is a failure? > > Do I need

[Freeipa-users] Re: dns of two out of three masters not up to date

2021-06-21 Thread Kees Bakker via FreeIPA-users
Hi, There is nothing in the daemon logs with "syncrepl" or "sync_repl". Should there be a syncrepl log for every update? Or only when there is a failure? Do I need to enable debugging of the dyndb plugin? -- Kees On 21-06-2021 18:56, Florence Renaud wrote: Hi, the high level view is the foll

[Freeipa-users] Re: dns of two out of three masters not up to date

2021-06-21 Thread Florence Renaud via FreeIPA-users
Hi, the high level view is the following: when there is an update related to DNS data on an IPA server (new/updated/deleted zone, new/updated/deleted record), it gets written to LDAP. As the LDAP data is replicated to the other IPA servers, their local LDAP database gets updated. The bind daemon r