Re: [Freeipa-users] 2.20 dirsrv memory usage

2012-07-13 Thread Rob Crittenden
Stephen Ingram wrote: On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 2:59 PM, Steven Jones steven.jo...@vuw.ac.nz wrote: Hi, I had huge memory issues pre 6.3, now its low and flatSounds like you have an issue somewhere. My normal cpu use is a few hundred mhzbut when something goes wrong such as replication

[Freeipa-users] Slowdowns in freeIPA 2.2.0

2012-07-13 Thread Loris Santamaria
I have this test server with 8.000 entries, recently upgraded from 2.1.3 to 2.2.0 and I'm seeing some big slowdowns and I would like to know where to look to debug them. The server is centos 6.3 with ipa-server-2.2.0-16.el6.x86_64 and 389-ds-base-1.2.10.2-20.el6_3.x86_64 First of all in 2.2.0

Re: [Freeipa-users] Slowdowns in freeIPA 2.2.0

2012-07-13 Thread Dmitri Pal
On 07/13/2012 11:46 AM, Loris Santamaria wrote: I have this test server with 8.000 entries, recently upgraded from 2.1.3 to 2.2.0 and I'm seeing some big slowdowns and I would like to know where to look to debug them. The server is centos 6.3 with ipa-server-2.2.0-16.el6.x86_64 and

Re: [Freeipa-users] BIND named.conf

2012-07-13 Thread Dmitri Pal
On 07/13/2012 07:04 PM, Michael Mercier wrote: Hello, I am by no means an expert either, but I believe what you are recommending would forward requests for myzone.tld to the ip.of.forwarder1 etc. I want ipaserver1 to actually be a slave (do AXFR / IXFR -- hold all the data) of myzone.tld,

Re: [Freeipa-users] BIND named.conf

2012-07-13 Thread Michael Mercier
I will try to be more clear... My IPA zone is named intranet.local running on ipaserver1 and ipaserver2. I have another zone (call it myzone.tld) hosted on some other systems. I would like ipaserver1 and ipaserver2 to both be a slave for this zone (not use a forwarder for the zone).