Re: [Freeipa-users] External Collaboration Domains

2014-04-17 Thread Dmitri Pal
On 04/15/2014 06:05 PM, Nordgren, Bryce L -FS wrote: Variant (A) - IdP + PKINIT: A1) User authenticates to his SAML/OpenID provider (external domain) A2) User locally generates CSR A3) User contacts IdP (gssapi/saml ; gssapi/openid) and sends CSR to the IdP A4) IdP returns short-lived

Re: [Freeipa-users] External Collaboration Domains

2014-04-15 Thread Nordgren, Bryce L -FS
Variant (A) - IdP + PKINIT: A1) User authenticates to his SAML/OpenID provider (external domain) A2) User locally generates CSR A3) User contacts IdP (gssapi/saml ; gssapi/openid) and sends CSR to the IdP A4) IdP returns short-lived certificate (validity period matches policy for

Re: [Freeipa-users] External Collaboration Domains

2014-04-14 Thread Petr Spacek
On 13.4.2014 15:21, Dmitri Pal wrote: There is where I see a leap of faith. SAML - SSH. It is not possible. And I am not sure OpenSSH would be interested to support it. They had hard time supporting Certs. No SAML-SSH. Even if it were possible, it would involve configuring every host in the

Re: [Freeipa-users] External Collaboration Domains

2014-04-14 Thread Simo Sorce
On Mon, 2014-04-14 at 12:23 +0200, Petr Spacek wrote: On 13.4.2014 15:21, Dmitri Pal wrote: There is where I see a leap of faith. SAML - SSH. It is not possible. And I am not sure OpenSSH would be interested to support it. They had hard time supporting Certs. No SAML-SSH. Even if it were

Re: [Freeipa-users] External Collaboration Domains

2014-04-13 Thread Dmitri Pal
On 04/11/2014 08:47 PM, Nordgren, Bryce L -FS wrote: There is a groups pf people that belong to different organizations, for example universities that launch a project together. They have the identities in their own home organization (domains). There is a hosting organization that some of the

Re: [Freeipa-users] External Collaboration Domains

2014-04-11 Thread Dmitri Pal
On 04/11/2014 04:22 PM, Nordgren, Bryce L -FS wrote: I guess we just do not see this scenario in practice yet. What I've found in the last decade is that scientists and CIO types cannot talk for lack of a common language. CIO types believe in closed systems over which they have complete

Re: [Freeipa-users] External Collaboration Domains

2014-04-11 Thread Simo Sorce
On Fri, 2014-04-11 at 17:58 -0400, Dmitri Pal wrote: C] If I am trying to ssh into one of our collaboration resources when I'm visiting a collaborator, I'm forced to use my SAML credentials because I can't reach AD. Because we will not be synchronizing all users against our SAML IdPs, my SAML

Re: [Freeipa-users] External Collaboration Domains

2014-04-11 Thread Nordgren, Bryce L -FS
There is a groups pf people that belong to different organizations, for example universities that launch a project together. They have the identities in their own home organization (domains). There is a hosting organization that some of the members of the group might belong to. Jointly all

Re: [Freeipa-users] External Collaboration Domains

2014-04-10 Thread Nordgren, Bryce L -FS
Close. The problem is to expose kerberized services in the local realm to users holding foreign credentials, supporting SSO wherever possible. This includes file sharing via NFS, kerberized web apps, ssh logins, and anything else the local realm has to offer. SSSD can handle ssh logins (if

Re: [Freeipa-users] External Collaboration Domains

2014-04-10 Thread Dmitri Pal
On 04/10/2014 05:40 PM, Nordgren, Bryce L -FS wrote: Close. The problem is to expose kerberized services in the local realm to users holding foreign credentials, supporting SSO wherever possible. This includes file sharing via NFS, kerberized web apps, ssh logins, and anything else the local

Re: [Freeipa-users] External Collaboration Domains

2014-04-08 Thread Dmitri Pal
On 04/08/2014 12:50 PM, Nordgren, Bryce L -FS wrote: Sorry for the delayed reply. This is other duties as assigned and the day job got in the way. :) However, the computer is busy running fits to data for the next day or so. My electronic master is thus distracted. Wow! First of all thanks

Re: [Freeipa-users] External Collaboration Domains

2014-03-30 Thread Alexander Bokovoy
On Sun, 30 Mar 2014, Nordgren, Bryce L -FS wrote: Hey guys, Back again. Thanks for your responses so far. OTP is interesting, but requires that an account be created in the local domain, which is kind of opposed to the notion of federated identities. Ipsilon is also interesting, from its

Re: [Freeipa-users] External Collaboration Domains

2014-03-30 Thread Nordgren, Bryce L -FS
I think it does not really differ from what I described, conceptually. It is, however, requiring much more work than what I described. FreeIPA has flat LDAP DIT. Adding support for separate OUs is in itself a non- trivial task. Ah. Well since that's the case, separate OUs are gone. (You may

Re: [Freeipa-users] External Collaboration Domains

2014-03-30 Thread Dmitri Pal
On 03/30/2014 03:14 PM, Nordgren, Bryce L -FS wrote: I think it does not really differ from what I described, conceptually. It is, however, requiring much more work than what I described. FreeIPA has flat LDAP DIT. Adding support for separate OUs is in itself a non- trivial task. Ah. Well

Re: [Freeipa-users] External Collaboration Domains

2014-03-26 Thread Dmitri Pal
On 03/25/2014 03:12 AM, Alexander Bokovoy wrote: On Tue, 25 Mar 2014, Nordgren, Bryce L -FS wrote: Collaboration can be in different ways. It all depends on the use case. It can be OpenID, SAML, Kerberos, etc. There are different technologies and they suit better different use cases. Can

Re: [Freeipa-users] External Collaboration Domains

2014-03-25 Thread Alexander Bokovoy
On Tue, 25 Mar 2014, Nordgren, Bryce L -FS wrote: Collaboration can be in different ways. It all depends on the use case. It can be OpenID, SAML, Kerberos, etc. There are different technologies and they suit better different use cases. Can you please share under what circumstances such

[Freeipa-users] External Collaboration Domains

2014-03-24 Thread Nordgren, Bryce L -FS
Collaboration can be in different ways. It all depends on the use case. It can be OpenID, SAML, Kerberos, etc. There are different technologies and they suit better different use cases. Can you please share under what circumstances such inversion would actually be needed? Console logins in a