On Wed, 26 May 2010 03:40:33 -0500
Rob Townley wrote:
> Tinc does not have a common shared secret between peers but that would
> probably be an improvement to make it more like the hamachi vpn. If
> both nodes do not have each other's public key host file, they should
> not be able to communicat
Rob Townley wrote:
> On Wed, May 12, 2010 at 4:38 PM, Dmitri Pal wrote:
>
>> Rob Townley wrote:
>>
>>> The main difference between tinc vpns and traditional vpns is that
>>> tinc is bidirectional and does not require the user to enter a
>>> username password. So if the computer is turned
On Wed, May 12, 2010 at 2:04 PM, Simo Sorce wrote:
> On Wed, 12 May 2010 12:24:00 -0500
> Rob Townley wrote:
>
>> The main difference between tinc vpns and traditional vpns is that
>> tinc is bidirectional and does not require the user to enter a
>> username password. So if the computer is turne
On Wed, May 12, 2010 at 4:38 PM, Dmitri Pal wrote:
> Rob Townley wrote:
>> The main difference between tinc vpns and traditional vpns is that
>> tinc is bidirectional and does not require the user to enter a
>> username password. So if the computer is turned on, the remote
>> machine is reachable
Rob Townley wrote:
> The main difference between tinc vpns and traditional vpns is that
> tinc is bidirectional and does not require the user to enter a
> username password. So if the computer is turned on, the remote
> machine is reachable by the IT department. If it is a windows
> machine, you
On Wed, 12 May 2010 12:24:00 -0500
Rob Townley wrote:
> The main difference between tinc vpns and traditional vpns is that
> tinc is bidirectional and does not require the user to enter a
> username password. So if the computer is turned on, the remote
> machine is reachable by the IT department
The main difference between tinc vpns and traditional vpns is that
tinc is bidirectional and does not require the user to enter a
username password. So if the computer is turned on, the remote
machine is reachable by the IT department. If it is a windows
machine, you may want to verify antivirus
On Wed, May 12, 2010 at 12:24:00PM -0500, Rob Townley wrote:
>
> Yes, it is a machine level as opposed to user level vpn. tinc would
> have to run all machines to make it the easiest to use. With freeipa,
> that could be easy.
>
> The keys currently are RSA public / private keypairs.
>
> Does
Rob Townley wrote:
Microsoft is touting "Direct Access" as a main reason to upgrade to
Win2008R2 / Win7.
Microsoft makes it seem like a magical feature, but could be done
using existing technology.
The reality is that discontinuous offline access to ActiveDirectory
was not thought out well in the
On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 04:42:26PM -0500, Rob Townley wrote:
> Microsoft is touting "Direct Access" as a main reason to upgrade to
> Win2008R2 / Win7.
All i see there functionalitywise can be provided by a vpn-endpoint
using kerberos/ldap for authentication/authorization.
As a feature i read 'us
Microsoft is touting "Direct Access" as a main reason to upgrade to
Win2008R2 / Win7.
Microsoft makes it seem like a magical feature, but could be done
using existing technology.
The reality is that discontinuous offline access to ActiveDirectory
was not thought out well in the first place.
Now tha
Microsoft is touting "Direct Access" as a main reason to upgrade to
Win2008R2 / Win7.
Microsoft makes it seem like a magical feature, but could be done
using existing technology.
The reality is that discontinuous offline access to ActiveDirectory
was not thought out well in the first place.
Now tha
12 matches
Mail list logo
