Re: [Freeipa-users] LDAP based autofs map redundancy

2017-03-14 Thread William Muriithi
Hello, To add to previous mail, I have noticed this: I had two IPA, hydrogen and lithium. lithium died and will be resetting another soon after I find why the setup isn't redundant with one IPA. But this line seem to be a lead Working: ipa_server = _srv_, hydrogen.eng.example.com Failing: ip

Re: [Freeipa-users] LDAP based autofs map redundancy

2017-03-05 Thread Jakub Hrozek
On Sun, Mar 05, 2017 at 02:59:39PM -0500, William Muriithi wrote: > Jakub, > > >> > >> It does look though like kerberos is not affected as all systems can > >> authenticate fine, so looks like its autofs issue alone > >> > >> This is the error I am noticing on the logs. > >> > >> Mar 2 14:18:29

Re: [Freeipa-users] LDAP based autofs map redundancy

2017-03-05 Thread William Muriithi
Jakub, >> >> It does look though like kerberos is not affected as all systems can >> authenticate fine, so looks like its autofs issue alone >> >> This is the error I am noticing on the logs. >> >> Mar 2 14:18:29 platinum automount[2887]: key "brad" not found in map >> source(s). >> Mar 2 14:19

Re: [Freeipa-users] LDAP based autofs map redundancy

2017-03-02 Thread Jakub Hrozek
On Thu, Mar 02, 2017 at 03:28:38PM -0500, William Muriithi wrote: > Afternoon, > > > I have noticed that even when a network has two IPA for redundancy, > autofs don't seem to be able to take advantage of the remaining IPA > should one of the IPA goes down. > > Is this a know issue with LDAP bas

[Freeipa-users] LDAP based autofs map redundancy

2017-03-02 Thread William Muriithi
Afternoon, I have noticed that even when a network has two IPA for redundancy, autofs don't seem to be able to take advantage of the remaining IPA should one of the IPA goes down. Is this a know issue with LDAP based maps or is it a configuration that need to be adjusted. By the way, only about