Re: [Freeipa-users] samba vs ipa without kerberos

2015-07-03 Thread Simo Sorce
On Fri, 2015-07-03 at 12:24 +0200, Christoph Kaminski wrote: > Hi > > it is possible (without extra patch/schema extension) to use samba shares > without kerberos? Possibly is there something like a auth proxy for it? I > mean the user authenticates with a password and the proxy checks it > sec

Re: [Freeipa-users] samba vs ipa without kerberos

2015-07-03 Thread Christoph Kaminski
istoph Kaminski > To: FreeIPA > Date:03.07.2015 12:26 > Subject:[Freeipa-users] samba vs ipa without kerberos > Sent by:freeipa-users-boun...@redhat.com > > > > Hi > > it is possible (without extra patch/schema extension) to use samba shares > witho

Re: [Freeipa-users] samba vs ipa without kerberos

2015-07-03 Thread Christopher Lamb
d". mfg Chris From: Christoph Kaminski To: FreeIPA Date: 03.07.2015 12:26 Subject: [Freeipa-users] samba vs ipa without kerberos Sent by:freeipa-users-boun...@redhat.com Hi it is possible (without extra patch/schema extension) to use samba shares without k

[Freeipa-users] samba vs ipa without kerberos

2015-07-03 Thread Christoph Kaminski
Hi it is possible (without extra patch/schema extension) to use samba shares without kerberos? Possibly is there something like a auth proxy for it? I mean the user authenticates with a password and the proxy checks it securly against ipa... any howtos/docs/ideas? (have ipa 4.1 and samba 4.1.1