On 09/02/2016 03:15 PM, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
On (24/08/16 11:42), Orion Poplawski wrote:
While that is definitely *a* convention, it's not the one we've used which
puts users by default in shared groups (nwra, visitors, etc). For example:
uid=2941(user) gid=1991(nwra)
The user "user"
On (24/08/16 11:42), Orion Poplawski wrote:
>While that is definitely *a* convention, it's not the one we've used which
>puts users by default in shared groups (nwra, visitors, etc). For example:
>
>uid=2941(user) gid=1991(nwra)
>
The user "user" should be a member "nwra" group.
If no then you
FWIW - I've filed https://fedorahosted.org/freeipa/ticket/6293 to request the
ability to set the primary group for AD trust users.
On 08/24/2016 11:42 AM, Orion Poplawski wrote:
> While that is definitely *a* convention, it's not the one we've used which
> puts users by default in shared groups
While that is definitely *a* convention, it's not the one we've used which
puts users by default in shared groups (nwra, visitors, etc). For example:
uid=2941(user) gid=1991(nwra)
We may be fine changing conventions, but I'm researching whether or not we
have to.
Thanks.
On 08/24/2016 11:19
Could you please explain further what you are trying to accomplish with
an AD trust default group? I believe we are following the standard linux
convention of creating a user private group using the ID number which
matches the uid number for AD trust users.
Kind regards,
Justin Stephenson
