On 12/16/2011 03:41 PM, Dmitri Pal wrote:
On 12/16/2011 02:37 PM, Alan Evans wrote:
Adam,
This is great news. The feedback I have after a quick read through (I
will try to put a bit more time on it later) would be to make the
'tennant' separation more flexible and why not use existing ldap
On 12/16/2011 02:37 PM, Alan Evans wrote:
Adam,
This is great news. The feedback I have after a quick read through (I
will try to put a bit more time on it later) would be to make the
'tennant' separation more flexible and why not use existing ldap
schema?
Instead of forcing the user into
On Wed, 2011-09-14 at 11:36 -0400, Dmitri Pal wrote:
Can Freeipa accommodate a mufti-tennant environment? i.e. I work for
a managed service provider that currently uses LDAP for authentication
for both our users and our customer's users. But Customer A cannot
see Customer B's data due to
On Wed, 2011-09-14 at 15:08 -0400, Simo Sorce wrote:
On Wed, 2011-09-14 at 11:36 -0400, Dmitri Pal wrote:
Can Freeipa accommodate a mufti-tennant environment? i.e. I work for
a managed service provider that currently uses LDAP for authentication
for both our users and our customer's users.
On Wed, 2011-09-14 at 15:19 -0400, Rob Crittenden wrote:
Simo Sorce wrote:
On Wed, 2011-09-14 at 15:08 -0400, Simo Sorce wrote:
On Wed, 2011-09-14 at 11:36 -0400, Dmitri Pal wrote:
Can Freeipa accommodate a mufti-tennant environment? i.e. I work for
a managed service provider that
Thanks all for your quick replies. My case is a bit of a corner case
anyway so I was not expecting to have a perfect solution. Having
tested out freeipa a few times in the last couple years it is
certainly impressive the progress that has been made.
I think for now I am going to continue using
