On 12/05/2012 08:20 AM, Natxo Asenjo wrote:
hi,
why would I want sssd to cache group/hostgroup/netgroup membership?
Going to the server for every identity lookup is very expensive and
creates a lot of traffic.
Some level of caching is needed to avoid unnecessary lookups. NSCD has
been filling
On Wed, Dec 05, 2012 at 02:20:40PM +0100, Natxo Asenjo wrote:
hi,
why would I want sssd to cache group/hostgroup/netgroup membership?
Is the performance hit so huge on the ldap servers?
I ask this because Windows admins are used to apply membership of
groups to objects and the changes
On Wed, Dec 5, 2012 at 3:11 PM, Jakub Hrozek jhro...@redhat.com wrote:
On Wed, Dec 05, 2012 at 02:20:40PM +0100, Natxo Asenjo wrote:
hi,
why would I want sssd to cache group/hostgroup/netgroup membership?
Is the performance hit so huge on the ldap servers?
I ask this because Windows admins
On Wed, Dec 05, 2012 at 03:19:51PM +0100, Natxo Asenjo wrote:
On Wed, Dec 5, 2012 at 3:11 PM, Jakub Hrozek jhro...@redhat.com wrote:
On Wed, Dec 05, 2012 at 02:20:40PM +0100, Natxo Asenjo wrote:
hi,
why would I want sssd to cache group/hostgroup/netgroup membership?
Is the performance
On Wed, 2012-12-05 at 14:20 +0100, Natxo Asenjo wrote:
hi,
why would I want sssd to cache group/hostgroup/netgroup membership?
Is the performance hit so huge on the ldap servers?
Yes, and not only on servers, on the client too.
I ask this because Windows admins are used to apply
