Am 16.10.2012 23:40, schrieb Simo Sorce:
> On Tue, 2012-10-16 at 14:22 -0700, Nathan Kinder wrote:
>> On 10/16/2012 05:21 AM, Simo Sorce wrote:
>>> On Tue, 2012-10-16 at 10:06 +0200, Marc Grimme wrote:
Am 15.10.2012 15:50, schrieb Simo Sorce:
> On Mon, 2012-10-15 at 14:15 +0200, Marc Grimm
On Tue, 2012-10-16 at 14:51 -0700, Nathan Kinder wrote:
> On 10/16/2012 02:40 PM, Simo Sorce wrote:
> > On Tue, 2012-10-16 at 14:22 -0700, Nathan Kinder wrote:
> >> On 10/16/2012 05:21 AM, Simo Sorce wrote:
> >>> On Tue, 2012-10-16 at 10:06 +0200, Marc Grimme wrote:
> Am 15.10.2012 15:50, schr
On 10/16/2012 02:40 PM, Simo Sorce wrote:
On Tue, 2012-10-16 at 14:22 -0700, Nathan Kinder wrote:
On 10/16/2012 05:21 AM, Simo Sorce wrote:
On Tue, 2012-10-16 at 10:06 +0200, Marc Grimme wrote:
Am 15.10.2012 15:50, schrieb Simo Sorce:
On Mon, 2012-10-15 at 14:15 +0200, Marc Grimme wrote:
Am
On Tue, 2012-10-16 at 14:22 -0700, Nathan Kinder wrote:
> On 10/16/2012 05:21 AM, Simo Sorce wrote:
> > On Tue, 2012-10-16 at 10:06 +0200, Marc Grimme wrote:
> >> Am 15.10.2012 15:50, schrieb Simo Sorce:
> >>> On Mon, 2012-10-15 at 14:15 +0200, Marc Grimme wrote:
> Am 14.10.2012 23:14, schrieb
On 10/16/2012 05:21 AM, Simo Sorce wrote:
On Tue, 2012-10-16 at 10:06 +0200, Marc Grimme wrote:
Am 15.10.2012 15:50, schrieb Simo Sorce:
On Mon, 2012-10-15 at 14:15 +0200, Marc Grimme wrote:
Am 14.10.2012 23:14, schrieb Simo Sorce:
On Fri, 2012-10-12 at 16:47 +0200, Marc Grimme wrote:
Right I
On Tue, 2012-10-16 at 10:06 +0200, Marc Grimme wrote:
> Am 15.10.2012 15:50, schrieb Simo Sorce:
> > On Mon, 2012-10-15 at 14:15 +0200, Marc Grimme wrote:
> >> Am 14.10.2012 23:14, schrieb Simo Sorce:
> >>> On Fri, 2012-10-12 at 16:47 +0200, Marc Grimme wrote:
> >>> Right I am ok with sambaPwdMustC
Am 15.10.2012 15:50, schrieb Simo Sorce:
> On Mon, 2012-10-15 at 14:15 +0200, Marc Grimme wrote:
>> Am 14.10.2012 23:14, schrieb Simo Sorce:
>>> On Fri, 2012-10-12 at 16:47 +0200, Marc Grimme wrote:
>>> Right I am ok with sambaPwdMustChange not being set. That's all good.
>>> What about sambaPwdLas
Marc Grimme wrote:
Am 14.10.2012 23:14, schrieb Simo Sorce:
On Fri, 2012-10-12 at 16:47 +0200, Marc Grimme wrote:
Right I am ok with sambaPwdMustChange not being set. That's all good.
What about sambaPwdLastSet ?
Not set when a user is created new.
When I change the password:
sambaPwdLastSet: 0
On Mon, 2012-10-15 at 14:15 +0200, Marc Grimme wrote:
> Am 14.10.2012 23:14, schrieb Simo Sorce:
> > On Fri, 2012-10-12 at 16:47 +0200, Marc Grimme wrote:
> > Right I am ok with sambaPwdMustChange not being set. That's all good.
> > What about sambaPwdLastSet ?
> Not set when a user is created new.
Am 14.10.2012 23:14, schrieb Simo Sorce:
> On Fri, 2012-10-12 at 16:47 +0200, Marc Grimme wrote:
> Right I am ok with sambaPwdMustChange not being set. That's all good.
> What about sambaPwdLastSet ?
Not set when a user is created new.
When I change the password:
sambaPwdLastSet: 0
Not working with
On Fri, 2012-10-12 at 16:47 +0200, Marc Grimme wrote:
> After me switching to
> ldap passwd sync = only
> I cannot see it changing the values if already set.
> But for new users it might not be set. As I have some without these
> attributes set.
> If I create a new user (say tuser2) as follows:
>
Marc Grimme wrote:
Am 12.10.2012 16:19, schrieb Simo Sorce:
On Fri, 2012-10-12 at 13:20 +0200, Marc Grimme wrote:
Am 11.10.2012 18:12, schrieb Simo Sorce:
On Thu, 2012-10-11 at 17:48 +0200, Marc Grimme wrote:
On Do 11 Okt 2012 14:37:57 CEST, Simo Sorce wrote:
No they are integrated in the Ker
Am 12.10.2012 16:19, schrieb Simo Sorce:
> On Fri, 2012-10-12 at 13:20 +0200, Marc Grimme wrote:
>> Am 11.10.2012 18:12, schrieb Simo Sorce:
>>> On Thu, 2012-10-11 at 17:48 +0200, Marc Grimme wrote:
On Do 11 Okt 2012 14:37:57 CEST, Simo Sorce wrote:
No they are integrated in the Kerberos
On Fri, 2012-10-12 at 13:20 +0200, Marc Grimme wrote:
> Am 11.10.2012 18:12, schrieb Simo Sorce:
> > On Thu, 2012-10-11 at 17:48 +0200, Marc Grimme wrote:
> >> On Do 11 Okt 2012 14:37:57 CEST, Simo Sorce wrote:
> >>>
> >> No they are integrated in the Kerberos Domain of IPA but not joined to
> >>
On Fri, 2012-10-12 at 09:38 -0400, Dmitri Pal wrote:
> >> Can you check if the use has the attribute sambaPwdMustChange set ?
>
> Should we open a ticket to manage this attribute?
I thought I had a reason why it wasn't needed, but I may be wrong.
I want to make sure it is/isn't but if you want t
On 10/12/2012 07:20 AM, Marc Grimme wrote:
> Am 11.10.2012 18:12, schrieb Simo Sorce:
>> On Thu, 2012-10-11 at 17:48 +0200, Marc Grimme wrote:
>>> On Do 11 Okt 2012 14:37:57 CEST, Simo Sorce wrote:
>>> No they are integrated in the Kerberos Domain of IPA but not joined to
>>> the samba domain.
>>>
Am 11.10.2012 18:12, schrieb Simo Sorce:
> On Thu, 2012-10-11 at 17:48 +0200, Marc Grimme wrote:
>> On Do 11 Okt 2012 14:37:57 CEST, Simo Sorce wrote:
>>>
>> No they are integrated in the Kerberos Domain of IPA but not joined to
>> the samba domain.
>>> Ok. Sorry I'm using ldap passwd sync=Yes Is
On Thu, 2012-10-11 at 17:48 +0200, Marc Grimme wrote:
> On Do 11 Okt 2012 14:37:57 CEST, Simo Sorce wrote:
> > On Thu, 2012-10-11 at 09:43 +0200, Marc Grimme wrote:
> >> On Mi 10 Okt 2012 17:54:22 CEST, Simo Sorce wrote:
> >> They are changing their passwords via ssh, sssd (kpasswd underneath) or
>
On Do 11 Okt 2012 14:37:57 CEST, Simo Sorce wrote:
> On Thu, 2012-10-11 at 09:43 +0200, Marc Grimme wrote:
>> On Mi 10 Okt 2012 17:54:22 CEST, Simo Sorce wrote:
>> They are changing their passwords via ssh, sssd (kpasswd underneath) or
>> directly over kpasswd.
>>
>> BTW: What would be the recommen
On Thu, 2012-10-11 at 09:43 +0200, Marc Grimme wrote:
> On Mi 10 Okt 2012 17:54:22 CEST, Simo Sorce wrote:
> > On Wed, 2012-10-10 at 17:11 +0200, Marc Grimme wrote:
> >> Hello together,
> >> we are running IPA on RHEL6.3 for quite some time.
> >> We are also using IPA to provide the LDAP backend fo
On Mi 10 Okt 2012 17:54:22 CEST, Simo Sorce wrote:
> On Wed, 2012-10-10 at 17:11 +0200, Marc Grimme wrote:
>> Hello together,
>> we are running IPA on RHEL6.3 for quite some time.
>> We are also using IPA to provide the LDAP backend for our samba
>> configuration.
>> Normally everything is running
On Wed, 2012-10-10 at 17:11 +0200, Marc Grimme wrote:
> Hello together,
> we are running IPA on RHEL6.3 for quite some time.
> We are also using IPA to provide the LDAP backend for our samba
> configuration.
> Normally everything is running quite ok.
>
> But from time to time some people inform me
22 matches
Mail list logo
