Re: [Freeipa-users] CentOS 7 & FreeIPA 4.2: DNS resolution at the top-level domain/zone

2016-06-21 Thread Petr Spacek
ate: Tuesday, June 21, 2016 at 07:21 > To: "freeipa-users@redhat.com" <freeipa-users@redhat.com> > Subject: Re: [Freeipa-users] CentOS 7 & FreeIPA 4.2: DNS resolution at the > top-level domain/zone > > Hi Petr, > > Top level means the root zone of

Re: [Freeipa-users] CentOS 7 & FreeIPA 4.2: DNS resolution at the top-level domain/zone

2016-06-21 Thread Dan.Finkelstein
ne 21, 2016 at 07:21 To: "freeipa-users@redhat.com" <freeipa-users@redhat.com> Subject: Re: [Freeipa-users] CentOS 7 & FreeIPA 4.2: DNS resolution at the top-level domain/zone Hi Petr, Top level means the root zone of the various DNS trees we serve. For example, h5g.co

Re: [Freeipa-users] CentOS 7 & FreeIPA 4.2: DNS resolution at the top-level domain/zone

2016-06-21 Thread Dan.Finkelstein
k <pspa...@redhat.com> Organization: Red Hat Date: Tuesday, June 21, 2016 at 06:04 To: "freeipa-users@redhat.com" <freeipa-users@redhat.com> Subject: Re: [Freeipa-users] CentOS 7 & FreeIPA 4.2: DNS resolution at the top-level domain/zone On 21.6.2016 11:23, dan.finkelst.

Re: [Freeipa-users] CentOS 7 & FreeIPA 4.2: DNS resolution at the top-level domain/zone

2016-06-21 Thread Petr Spacek
On 21.6.2016 11:23, dan.finkelst...@high5games.com wrote: > We've recently set up a "clean" install of FreeIPA replete with replicas, but > we just noticed an odd behavior in the DNS service: hosts in the top level > domain (like ipa.example.com) do not resolve, whereas hosts in subdomains >

[Freeipa-users] CentOS 7 & FreeIPA 4.2: DNS resolution at the top-level domain/zone

2016-06-21 Thread Dan.Finkelstein
We've recently set up a "clean" install of FreeIPA replete with replicas, but we just noticed an odd behavior in the DNS service: hosts in the top level domain (like ipa.example.com) do not resolve, whereas hosts in subdomains (like ipa.dev.example.com) do. I'm not sure what to look for in the