On Wednesday, August 13, 2014 08:57:19 PM Rob Crittenden wrote:
> Erinn Looney-Triggs wrote:
> > On 08/12/2014 09:21 AM, Alexander Bokovoy wrote:
> >> On Tue, 12 Aug 2014, Erinn Looney-Triggs wrote:
> >>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256
> >>>
> >>> On 08/11/2014 09:08 AM, Martin Ko
Erinn Looney-Triggs wrote:
> On 08/12/2014 09:21 AM, Alexander Bokovoy wrote:
>> On Tue, 12 Aug 2014, Erinn Looney-Triggs wrote:
>>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256
>>>
>>> On 08/11/2014 09:08 AM, Martin Kosek wrote:
On 08/11/2014 04:24 PM, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
> On Mon, Aug
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 08/12/2014 12:33 PM, Alexander Bokovoy wrote:
> On Tue, 12 Aug 2014, Erinn Looney-Triggs wrote:
I guess the part I don't get here, is that this setting does
not disable anonymous access to rootdse it just requires, as
far as I under
On Tue, 12 Aug 2014, Erinn Looney-Triggs wrote:
I guess the part I don't get here, is that this setting does not
disable anonymous access to rootdse it just requires, as far as
I understand, that TLS or some security be used for the
connection.
I currently have minssf set to 56 and am able to an
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 08/12/2014 09:21 AM, Alexander Bokovoy wrote:
> On Tue, 12 Aug 2014, Erinn Looney-Triggs wrote:
>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256
>>
>> On 08/11/2014 09:08 AM, Martin Kosek wrote:
>>> On 08/11/2014 04:24 PM, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 08/12/2014 09:21 AM, Alexander Bokovoy wrote:
> On Tue, 12 Aug 2014, Erinn Looney-Triggs wrote:
>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256
>>
>> On 08/11/2014 09:08 AM, Martin Kosek wrote:
>>> On 08/11/2014 04:24 PM, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
>
On Tue, 12 Aug 2014, Erinn Looney-Triggs wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 08/11/2014 09:08 AM, Martin Kosek wrote:
On 08/11/2014 04:24 PM, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 05:18:03PM +0300, Alexander Bokovoy
wrote:
On Sat, 09 Aug 2014, Erinn Looney-Triggs w
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 08/11/2014 09:08 AM, Martin Kosek wrote:
> On 08/11/2014 04:24 PM, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
>> On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 05:18:03PM +0300, Alexander Bokovoy
>> wrote:
>>> On Sat, 09 Aug 2014, Erinn Looney-Triggs wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
On 08/11/2014 04:24 PM, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 05:18:03PM +0300, Alexander Bokovoy wrote:
>> On Sat, 09 Aug 2014, Erinn Looney-Triggs wrote:
>>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>>> Hash: SHA256
>>>
>>> It would seem to be prudent to set the minssf setting for 389 to 56,
>>
On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 05:18:03PM +0300, Alexander Bokovoy wrote:
> On Sat, 09 Aug 2014, Erinn Looney-Triggs wrote:
> >-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> >Hash: SHA256
> >
> >It would seem to be prudent to set the minssf setting for 389 to 56,
> >however I am wondering why this isn't done by def
On Sat, 09 Aug 2014, Erinn Looney-Triggs wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
It would seem to be prudent to set the minssf setting for 389 to 56,
however I am wondering why this isn't done by default, and if there is
any reason why I shouldn't do it?
Anonymous connection to L
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
It would seem to be prudent to set the minssf setting for 389 to 56,
however I am wondering why this isn't done by default, and if there is
any reason why I shouldn't do it?
Thanks,
- -Erinn
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1
iQEcBAEBC
12 matches
Mail list logo