On Wed, 10 Feb 2016, Mike Kelly wrote:
On Wed, Feb 10, 2016 at 3:19 AM Alexander Bokovoy
wrote:
On Wed, 10 Feb 2016, Mike Kelly wrote:
>Is there some extra logging I can turn on to see why this ID View isn't
>being applied like I would expect? Or perhaps some extra bit
On 10.2.2016 20:05, Chris Lajoie wrote:
> Hi, I am using the bind-dyndb-ldap package (not full FreeIPA) and I am having
> a problem where it appears that the plugin is not getting loaded by BIND at
> all. I have nothing in the logs at all from the plugin. No failures of any
> kind, just regular
On Thu, 11 Feb 2016, Nik Lam wrote:
I've upgraded that package on both the IdM server and the (problem) client.
I haven't looked *really* closely at the logs or the trace output, but it
doesn't look like I'm getting any additional output.
However, on a whim, went to another client. This time I
On Thu, Feb 11, 2016 at 11:16:14AM +1100, Nik Lam wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 11, 2016 at 1:42 AM, Sumit Bose wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Feb 10, 2016 at 11:07:14PM +1100, Nik Lam wrote:
> > > On Wed, Feb 10, 2016 at 7:43 PM, Sumit Bose wrote:
> > >
> > > > On Wed, Feb 10,
On 11.2.2016 19:32, Chris Lajoie wrote:
> On 02/11/2016 02:46 AM, Petr Spacek wrote:
>> What version of BIND and bind-dyndb-ldap packages are you using? $ rpm
>> -q bind bind-dyndb-ldap
> bind-9.9.4-29.el7_2.2.x86_64 bind-dyndb-ldap-8.0-1.el7.x86_64
>>
>> I'm not sure how exactly the logging
Thank you!
Dodgig the dogtag guys, then ;-)
Il giorno Gio 11 Feb 2016 13:26 Martin Basti ha scritto:
>
>
> On 11.02.2016 12:51, Quasar wrote:
>
> Martin,
>
> I've re-tested the replica with a freshly-installed CentOS 7 (1511).
> Installation still fails (damn!) and the log is
On Thu, Feb 11, 2016 at 10:21:37AM +0200, Alexander Bokovoy wrote:
> On Wed, 10 Feb 2016, Mike Kelly wrote:
> >On Wed, Feb 10, 2016 at 3:19 AM Alexander Bokovoy
> >wrote:
> >
> >>On Wed, 10 Feb 2016, Mike Kelly wrote:
> >>
> >>>Is there some extra logging I can turn on to see
On Wed, Feb 10, 2016 at 04:05:20PM -0600, Michael Rainey (Contractor) wrote:
> Greetings,
>
> I'm curious as to how IPA handles smart cards containing multiple
> certificates. When I follow the steps listed at
> https://fedorahosted.org/sssd/wiki/DesignDocs/SmartcardAuthenticationStep1
> when
Hello,
comments inline.
On 11.02.2016 10:46, Quasar wrote:
Hi, I desperately need your help/advice with our ipa update process.
Briefly, we'd like to update our IPA 3.0 installation based on CentOS
6.7 to a newer version, and I read that the way of doing it is to
create a new replica with a
On 11.02.2016 12:51, Quasar wrote:
Martin,
I've re-tested the replica with a freshly-installed CentOS 7 (1511).
Installation still fails (damn!) and the log is a bit more verbose. I
suppose it has something to do with certificate in my master server
proably due to incremental updates did in
On 11.02.2016 11:05, Martin Basti wrote:
Hello,
comments inline.
On 11.02.2016 10:46, Quasar wrote:
Hi, I desperately need your help/advice with our ipa update process.
Briefly, we'd like to update our IPA 3.0 installation based on CentOS
6.7 to a newer version, and I read that the way of
On Thu, Feb 11, 2016 at 3:21 AM Alexander Bokovoy
wrote:
> On Wed, 10 Feb 2016, Mike Kelly wrote:
> >On Wed, Feb 10, 2016 at 3:19 AM Alexander Bokovoy
> >wrote:
> >
> >> On Wed, 10 Feb 2016, Mike Kelly wrote:
> >>
> >> >Is there some extra logging I can
On Wed, Feb 10, 2016 at 3:19 AM Alexander Bokovoy
wrote:
> On Wed, 10 Feb 2016, Mike Kelly wrote:
>
> >Is there some extra logging I can turn on to see why this ID View isn't
> >being applied like I would expect? Or perhaps some extra bit of
> >configuration I missed?
>
On 11.02.2016 13:33, Quasar wrote:
Thank you!
Dodgig the dogtag guys, then ;-)
Do you have CA configured as external CA?
It could be:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1291747
I don't think that it is already in CentOS
Il giorno Gio 11 Feb 2016 13:26 Martin Basti
Excellent news Martin! After checking the bug you shared with me, I tried
to check if pki-core-9.0.3-45.el6_7 was released for CentOS 6.7 and I was
quite lucky this time!
After a "yum update" I retried the teplica and this time everything went
smoothly!
Thanks a lot for your help and time!
Please disregard this email, as it was duplicated.
Sorry for the incovenience
On Tue, Feb 9, 2016 at 4:26 PM, wrote:
> Hi, I desperately need your help/advice with our ipa update process.
> Briefly, we'd like to update our IPA 3.0 installation based on CentOS
On 11.02.2016 14:49, Quasar wrote:
Excellent news Martin! After checking the bug you shared with me, I
tried to check if pki-core-9.0.3-45.el6_7 was released for CentOS 6.7
and I was quite lucky this time!
After a "yum update" I retried the teplica and this time everything
went smoothly!
Hi Martin,
first of all thanks for taking some time to read and provide feedback, much
appreciated.
I firstly tried with CentOS 7.x (build 1511) but got the same errore during
CA configuration. Then I supposed I had to upgrade step-by-step, from 3.0
to 3.3 (instead of 3.0 to 4.x) and used Fedora
On 02/11/2016 02:46 AM, Petr Spacek wrote:
What version of BIND and bind-dyndb-ldap packages are you using?
$ rpm -q bind bind-dyndb-ldap
bind-9.9.4-29.el7_2.2.x86_64
bind-dyndb-ldap-8.0-1.el7.x86_64
I'm not sure how exactly the logging magic in BIND works so I would recommend
you to to run
19 matches
Mail list logo