Evening,
I am trying to import some autos map from a file to FreeIPA LDAP and
have noticed two problems that can be considered a bug in my humble
opinion. This is on:
ipa-server-4.2.0-15.0.1.el7
1. This either is a documentation bug that suggest one can specify a
parent map while thats
Am 26.10.2016 um 16:27 schrieb Martin Basti:
>
>
>
> On 26.10.2016 16:10, Jochen Demmer wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> my answers also inline.
>>
>> Am 26.10.2016 um 15:38 schrieb Martin Basti:
>>>
>>> Hi, comments inline
>>>
>>>
>>> On 26.10.2016 14:28, Jochen Demmer wrote:
Hi,
I've been
On 26.10.2016 16:10, Jochen Demmer wrote:
Hi,
my answers also inline.
Am 26.10.2016 um 15:38 schrieb Martin Basti:
Hi, comments inline
On 26.10.2016 14:28, Jochen Demmer wrote:
Hi,
I've been running and using a single FreeIPA server successfully, i.e.:
Fedora 24
Michael Ströder wrote:
HI!
I'd like to add some custom entries (custom STRUCTURAL object class) to FreeIPA
tree in 389-DS. But I'd like to make sure that there won't be any issues when
upgrading the system later on.
So where to add a container for those custom objects?
At top-level domain
HI!
I'd like to add some custom entries (custom STRUCTURAL object class) to FreeIPA
tree in 389-DS. But I'd like to make sure that there won't be any issues when
upgrading the system later on.
So where to add a container for those custom objects?
At top-level domain entry?
BTW: Is there
On 26.10.2016 17:25, Jochen Demmer wrote:
Am 26.10.2016 um 16:48 schrieb Martin Basti:
On 26.10.2016 16:42, Jochen Demmer wrote:
Am 26.10.2016 um 16:27 schrieb Martin Basti:
On 26.10.2016 16:10, Jochen Demmer wrote:
Hi,
my answers also inline.
Am 26.10.2016 um 15:38 schrieb
Hi,
my answers also inline.
Am 26.10.2016 um 15:38 schrieb Martin Basti:
>
> Hi, comments inline
>
>
> On 26.10.2016 14:28, Jochen Demmer wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I've been running and using a single FreeIPA server successfully, i.e.:
>> Fedora 24
>> freeipa-server-4.3.2-2.fc24.x86_64
>> This server
On 26.10.2016 16:42, Jochen Demmer wrote:
Am 26.10.2016 um 16:27 schrieb Martin Basti:
On 26.10.2016 16:10, Jochen Demmer wrote:
Hi,
my answers also inline.
Am 26.10.2016 um 15:38 schrieb Martin Basti:
Hi, comments inline
On 26.10.2016 14:28, Jochen Demmer wrote:
Hi,
I've been
While trying to run IPA replica prepare with debug, we see an unexplained
failure.
Debug seems to show the process running smoothly, then I see: "Certificate
issuance failed".
Looking at previous mail-archives, I see that someone has run into this
before, however all permissions on
On Wed, Oct 26, 2016 at 04:18:12PM -0700, Joshua Ruybal wrote:
> While trying to run IPA replica prepare with debug, we see an unexplained
> failure.
>
> Debug seems to show the process running smoothly, then I see: "Certificate
> issuance failed".
>
> Looking at previous mail-archives, I see
Hello all,
I'm still having problems with my IPA Client install... My errors aren't
bringing up any meaningful results on Google, so I really appreciate any
hints anyone might have!
To narrow the scope of the problem, I simply rebuilt both the server and
the client from scratch... This time
hi all
quick question - does IPA rpms depend on samaba's?
I'm hoping I can remove samba-common but dnf fies a 46
packages long list of dependencies - is it somehow broken?
If is not and that is 100% correct long chain of deps - then
can samba be safely downgraded to 3.6.x ? given that IPA
Hi Everyone!
If I have two networks, say A and B, and I want both to use the same
FreeIPA server, should I have one Freeipa domain for network A and a
sub-domain for network B, (domain.local and b.domain.local), or should I
create two top level domains (a.local and b.local)? What's the
Does anybody have a clue on how to continue with this?
Kind Regards,
David
2016-10-24 10:10 GMT+02:00 David Dejaeghere :
> These are both the subjects for the old and new root ca cert.
>
> Subject: "CN=tokio-PAPRIKA-CA,DC=tokio,DC=local"
> Subject
Hi,
I've been running and using a single FreeIPA server successfully, i.e.:
Fedora 24
freeipa-server-4.3.2-2.fc24.x86_64
This server is only available via IPv6, because I can't get public lPv4
addresses no more.
Now I want to setup a FreeIPA replica at another site also running IPv6,
Fedora 24
On ke, 26 loka 2016, Ranbir wrote:
Hi Everyone!
If I have two networks, say A and B, and I want both to use the same
FreeIPA server, should I have one Freeipa domain for network A and a
sub-domain for network B, (domain.local and b.domain.local), or should
I create two top level domains
Hi, comments inline
On 26.10.2016 14:28, Jochen Demmer wrote:
Hi,
I've been running and using a single FreeIPA server successfully, i.e.:
Fedora 24
freeipa-server-4.3.2-2.fc24.x86_64
This server is only available via IPv6, because I can't get public
lPv4 addresses no more.
Now I want to
17 matches
Mail list logo