Re: [Freeipa-users] FreeIPA vs DogTag CA

2016-08-16 Thread Kaamel Periora
Thanks Rob and Fraser, appreciate your time in replying. Currently we are not using FreeIPA but dogtag 9 as an standalone system with RA and OCSP as well. We thought of migrating to the FreeIPA after looking at the the ease of management and excellent support community behind. We require SSL/TLS

Re: [Freeipa-users] FreeIPA vs DogTag CA

2016-08-16 Thread Kaamel Periora
, can i have it over CentOS? On Tue, Aug 16, 2016 at 3:04 PM, Fraser Tweedale wrote: > On Tue, Aug 16, 2016 at 02:54:41PM +0530, Kaamel Periora wrote: > > Thanks Rob and Fraser, appreciate your time in replying. > > > > Currently we are not using FreeIPA but dogtag 9 as

Re: [Freeipa-users] FreeIPA vs DogTag CA

2016-08-16 Thread Kaamel Periora
:25 PM, Fraser Tweedale wrote: > On Tue, Aug 16, 2016 at 04:29:02PM +0530, Kaamel Periora wrote: > > Thanks Fraser. > > > > So basically i can rule out FreeIPA and go ahead with DogTag. > > > > According to our security requirements, it is not wise to let the gen

[Freeipa-users] Padding Scheme used in Fedora Dogtag

2017-03-06 Thread Kaamel Periora
Dear All, It is required to identify the padding scheme used by the Fedora dogtag system. Appreciate of someone could shed some light on this requirement. Thanks -- Manage your subscription for the Freeipa-users mailing list: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/freeipa-users Go to http://fre

Re: [Freeipa-users] Padding Scheme used in Fedora Dogtag

2017-03-09 Thread Kaamel Periora
its for the encryption process. On Tue, Mar 7, 2017 at 7:55 PM, Simo Sorce wrote: > On Tue, 2017-03-07 at 12:38 +0530, Kaamel Periora wrote: > > Dear All, > > > > It is required to identify the padding scheme used by the Fedora dogtag > > system. Appreciate of someo