Re: [Freeipa-users] Question about removed replica, take two

2016-10-05 Thread John Desantis
Ludwig, Thank you! John DeSantis 2016-10-05 10:43 GMT-04:00 Ludwig Krispenz : > Hi, > > the RUV in the replication agreement is maintained to control changelog > trimming, no changes should be deleted from the changelog which have not > been seen by all consumers. Since not always a connection f

Re: [Freeipa-users] Question about removed replica, take two

2016-10-05 Thread Ludwig Krispenz
Hi, the RUV in the replication agreement is maintained to control changelog trimming, no changes should be deleted from the changelog which have not been seen by all consumers. Since not always a connection for a replication agreement can be established, eg if the consumer is down, this infor

[Freeipa-users] Question about removed replica, take two

2016-10-05 Thread John Desantis
Hello all (again), I think my reference to a disease prevented my message from being delivered, despite seeing it posted on the list archive. I apologize in advance for the additional "noise". Anyways, I was hoping some lingering questions could be answered regarding some visible entries via lda

[Freeipa-users] Question about removed replica

2016-10-04 Thread John Desantis
Hello all, Like a case of herpes, I'm back! Anyways, I was hoping some lingering questions could be answered regarding some visible entries via ldapsearch, which manifest a removed replica's hostname [1]. Running the ipa-replica-manage and ipa-csreplica-manage commands do not show the host in qu